head to head · open source

graphify vs ii-agent

graphify has 119,123 GitHub stars, 11,519 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ii-agent has 3,387 stars, 524 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. graphify leads on adoption by 3,417% (119,123 vs 3,387 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; ii-agent is written in Python under Apache-2.0. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ii-agent 15%. graphify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

graphify ★ 119K ii-agent ★ 3.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

graphify ii-agent
GitHub stars ★ 119K ★ 3.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-08-16
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 524
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick graphify if

  • You weight community size — 119K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full graphify profile →

pick ii-agent if

  • You want the ii-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ii-agent fits your workflow better

full ii-agent profile →

About graphify

graphify is an Apache 2.0 Python CLI and /graphify skill that turns a whole project — code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, PDFs, images, and video — into a queryable knowledge graph, built for developers and AI agent users in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI who want to query a codebase instead of grepping through files.

read the full graphify overview →

About ii-agent

II Agent is an Apache 2.0 open source Python framework for building, running, forking, and extending intelligent agents, aimed at solo developers, research teams, and enterprises that want full control over models and cost through bring your own key (BYOK) configuration.

read the full ii-agent overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

graphify vs Dify graphify vs langchain graphify vs ponytail graphify vs generative-ai-for-beginners graphify vs claude-mem graphify vs ragflow graphify vs PaddleOCR graphify vs Agent-Reach graphify vs headroom graphify vs Mem0 graphify vs daily_stock_analysis graphify vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is graphify or ii-agent more popular?

graphify has 119,123 GitHub stars and ii-agent has 3,387. graphify has the larger community by that measure.

Are graphify and ii-agent free?

Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ii-agent under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between graphify and ii-agent?

graphify is written in Python and ii-agent in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, graphify or ii-agent?

Choose graphify if you want the larger community (119,123 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ii-agent if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.