head to head · open source
graphify vs elephant-goldfish-model
graphify has 137,114 GitHub stars, 13,082 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. elephant-goldfish-model has 3,510 stars, 230 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. graphify leads on adoption by 3,806% (137,114 vs 3,510 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; elephant-goldfish-model is written in Python under Apache-2.0. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, elephant-goldfish-model 7%. elephant-goldfish-model was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 6 topic tags (ai-agents, antigravity, claude-code, codex), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| graphify | elephant-goldfish-model | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 137K | ★ 3.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-27 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 230 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick graphify if
- You weight community size — 137K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick elephant-goldfish-model if
- You want the elephant-goldfish-model feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and elephant-goldfish-model fits your workflow better
About graphify
Read this in other languages 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇫🇷 Français 🇪🇸 Español 🇮🇳 हिन्दी 🇧🇷 Português 🇷🇺 Русский 🇸🇦 العربية 🇮🇷 فارسی 🇮🇹 Italiano 🇵🇱 Polski 🇳🇱 Nederlands 🇹🇷 Türkçe 🇺🇦 Українська 🇻🇳 Tiếng Việt 🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia 🇸🇪 Svenska 🇬🇷 Ελληνικά 🇷🇴 Română 🇨🇿 Čeština 🇫🇮 Suomi 🇩🇰 Dansk 🇳🇴 Norsk 🇭🇺 Magyar 🇹🇭 ภาษาไทย 🇺🇿 Oʻzbekcha 🇹🇼 繁體中文 🇵🇭 Filipino 🇮🇱 עברית Early access to the graphify platform is open before the public v1 launch: app.graphify.com Type /graphify in your AI coding assistant and it maps your entire project (code…
read the full graphify overview →
About elephant-goldfish-model
Design with an elephant. Review with a goldfish. Install  ·  Quickstart  ·  Documentation  ·  Website Thousands of Google engineers use EGM, an open source plugin, to draft specs with deep context agents and stress test them with zero context subagents before writing code. Elephant holds your project context and drafts the specification. Goldfish reviewers examine the draft and referenced source material without the earlier conversation, helping expose unstated assumptions and blind spots. You make the architectural trade offs and approve the specification before implementing. Use…
read the full elephant-goldfish-model overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is graphify or elephant-goldfish-model more popular?
graphify has 137,114 GitHub stars and elephant-goldfish-model has 3,510. graphify has the larger community by that measure.
Are graphify and elephant-goldfish-model free?
Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and elephant-goldfish-model under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between graphify and elephant-goldfish-model?
graphify is written in Python and elephant-goldfish-model in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, graphify or elephant-goldfish-model?
Choose graphify if you want the larger community (137,114 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose elephant-goldfish-model if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.