head to head · open source
graphify vs code-review-graph
graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars, 13,483 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph has 32,563 stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. graphify leads on adoption by 333% (141,064 vs 32,563 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, code-review-graph 9%. graphify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (claude-code, graphrag), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| graphify | code-review-graph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 141K | ★ 33K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 3.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick graphify if
- You weight community size — 141K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick code-review-graph if
- You want the code-review-graph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and code-review-graph fits your workflow better
About graphify
Read this in other languages 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇫🇷 Français 🇪🇸 Español 🇮🇳 हिन्दी 🇧🇷 Português 🇷🇺 Русский 🇸🇦 العربية 🇮🇷 فارسی 🇮🇹 Italiano 🇵🇱 Polski 🇳🇱 Nederlands 🇹🇷 Türkçe 🇺🇦 Українська 🇻🇳 Tiếng Việt 🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia 🇸🇪 Svenska 🇬🇷 Ελληνικά 🇷🇴 Română 🇨🇿 Čeština 🇫🇮 Suomi 🇩🇰 Dansk 🇳🇴 Norsk 🇭🇺 Magyar 🇹🇭 ภาษาไทย 🇺🇿 Oʻzbekcha 🇹🇼 繁體中文 🇵🇭 Filipino 🇮🇱 עברית Early access to the graphify platform is open before the public v1 launch: app.graphify.com Type /graphify in your AI coding assistant and it maps your entire project (code…
read the full graphify overview →
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is graphify or code-review-graph more popular?
graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars and code-review-graph has 32,563. graphify has the larger community by that measure.
Are graphify and code-review-graph free?
Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and code-review-graph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between graphify and code-review-graph?
graphify is written in Python and code-review-graph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, graphify or code-review-graph?
Choose graphify if you want the larger community (141,064 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose code-review-graph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.