head to head · open source
graphify vs CL4R1T4S
graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars, 13,483 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CL4R1T4S has 51,704 stars, 10,555 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. graphify leads on adoption by 173% (141,064 vs 51,704 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; CL4R1T4S is written in various languages under AGPL-3.0. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, CL4R1T4S 20%. graphify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (gemini), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| graphify | CL4R1T4S | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 141K | ★ 52K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | — |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 11K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick graphify if
- You weight community size — 141K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CL4R1T4S if
- You want the CL4R1T4S feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- You evaluated both and CL4R1T4S fits your workflow better
About graphify
Read this in other languages 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇫🇷 Français 🇪🇸 Español 🇮🇳 हिन्दी 🇧🇷 Português 🇷🇺 Русский 🇸🇦 العربية 🇮🇷 فارسی 🇮🇹 Italiano 🇵🇱 Polski 🇳🇱 Nederlands 🇹🇷 Türkçe 🇺🇦 Українська 🇻🇳 Tiếng Việt 🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia 🇸🇪 Svenska 🇬🇷 Ελληνικά 🇷🇴 Română 🇨🇿 Čeština 🇫🇮 Suomi 🇩🇰 Dansk 🇳🇴 Norsk 🇭🇺 Magyar 🇹🇭 ภาษาไทย 🇺🇿 Oʻzbekcha 🇹🇼 繁體中文 🇵🇭 Filipino 🇮🇱 עברית Early access to the graphify platform is open before the public v1 launch: app.graphify.com Type /graphify in your AI coding assistant and it maps your entire project (code…
read the full graphify overview →
About CL4R1T4S
CL4R1T4S AI SYSTEMS TRANSPARENCY AND OBSERVABILITY FOR ALL! Full extracted system prompts, guidelines, and tools from OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, xAI, Perplexity, Cursor, Windsurf, Devin, Manus, Replit, and more – virtually all major AI models + agents! 📌 Why This Exists "In order to trust the output, one must understand the input." AI labs shape how models behave using massive, unseen prompt scaffolds. Because AI is a trusted external intelligence layer for a growing number of humans, these hidden instructions can affect the perceptions and behavior of the public. These prompts define: What AIs can’t say What…
read the full CL4R1T4S overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is graphify or CL4R1T4S more popular?
graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars and CL4R1T4S has 51,704. graphify has the larger community by that measure.
Are graphify and CL4R1T4S free?
Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CL4R1T4S under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between graphify and CL4R1T4S?
graphify is written in Python and CL4R1T4S in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, graphify or CL4R1T4S?
Choose graphify if you want the larger community (141,064 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose CL4R1T4S if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.