head to head · open source

free4chat vs xyne-spaces

free4chat has 1,196 GitHub stars, 168 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped today. xyne-spaces has 684 stars, 527 forks, 514 open issues and last shipped today. free4chat leads on adoption by 75% (1,196 vs 684 stars). free4chat is written in TypeScript under MIT; xyne-spaces is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. free4chat has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, xyne-spaces 77%. xyne-spaces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

free4chat ★ 1.2K xyne-spaces ★ 684 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

free4chat xyne-spaces
GitHub stars ★ 1.2K ★ 684
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 168 ⑂ 527
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick free4chat if

  • You weight community size — 1.2K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full free4chat profile →

pick xyne-spaces if

  • You want the xyne-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and xyne-spaces fits your workflow better

full xyne-spaces profile →

About free4chat

Free4Chat is an MIT licensed, TypeScript system for temporary capability access and collaboration that brings humans and independently running AI agents together in short lived Rooms to exchange realtime context, media, focused Tasks, and artifacts without accounts or a permanent workspace.

read the full free4chat overview →

About xyne-spaces

Xyne Spaces is an open source "AI Org OS" — an Apache 2.0, TypeScript collaboration platform that keeps an organization's context in one permission aware store and serves it back to both people and AI agents, making it a fit for teams that want human and agent work running over the same company knowledge rather than across a dozen disconnected tools.

read the full xyne-spaces overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 55K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

free4chat vs Plane free4chat vs Rocket.Chat free4chat vs cobalt free4chat vs Buzz free4chat vs Jitsi free4chat vs srs free4chat vs Huly free4chat vs Zulip free4chat vs etherpad free4chat vs univer free4chat vs drawnix free4chat vs chat

Frequently asked questions

Is free4chat or xyne-spaces more popular?

free4chat has 1,196 GitHub stars and xyne-spaces has 684. free4chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are free4chat and xyne-spaces free?

Both are open source. free4chat is licensed under MIT and xyne-spaces under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between free4chat and xyne-spaces?

free4chat is written in TypeScript and xyne-spaces in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, free4chat or xyne-spaces?

Choose free4chat if you want the larger community (1,196 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xyne-spaces if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.