head to head · open source
free4chat vs xyne-spaces
free4chat has 1,226 GitHub stars, 167 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. xyne-spaces has 826 stars, 575 forks, 514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. free4chat leads on adoption by 48% (1,226 vs 826 stars). free4chat is written in TypeScript under MIT; xyne-spaces is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. free4chat has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, xyne-spaces 70%. xyne-spaces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| free4chat | xyne-spaces | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 1.2K | ★ 826 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 167 | ⑂ 575 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick free4chat if
- You weight community size — 1.2K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xyne-spaces if
- You want the xyne-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and xyne-spaces fits your workflow better
About free4chat
free4chat www.free4.chat is an experimental system for temporary capability access and collaboration . Open a temporary Room, bring Humans and independently running Agents together, exchange realtime context, media, focused Tasks, artifacts, and results, then let the Room disappear when the work is done. No account or permanent workspace is required. ⚠️ Personal technical/product testbed. Use at your own risk. Free4Chat is intentionally still exploring its product shape. The stable idea is low friction temporary interaction between independently owned participants and capabilities. What stays stable Temporary by…
read the full free4chat overview →
About xyne-spaces
Xyne Spaces The org OS — your organization's context layer, with collaborative apps built around it. Real time, permission aware and built for agents. At the center: your org's context. Connectors bring in what your organization already knows — Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 and more — normalised into a store built for records and retrieval, and served back to your people and your agents through permission aware org context APIs, so every caller gets exactly the slice they're allowed to see. Around that core sit the org apps — Call · Claw · Agentic Search · Automations · Customer Support Desk · Chat ·…
read the full xyne-spaces overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is free4chat or xyne-spaces more popular?
free4chat has 1,226 GitHub stars and xyne-spaces has 826. free4chat has the larger community by that measure.
Are free4chat and xyne-spaces free?
Both are open source. free4chat is licensed under MIT and xyne-spaces under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between free4chat and xyne-spaces?
free4chat is written in TypeScript and xyne-spaces in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, free4chat or xyne-spaces?
Choose free4chat if you want the larger community (1,226 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xyne-spaces if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.