head to head · open source

flink-cdc vs ReplicaDB

flink-cdc has 6,477 GitHub stars, 2,197 forks, 119 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ReplicaDB has 500 stars, 114 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. flink-cdc leads on adoption by 1,195% (6,477 vs 500 stars). flink-cdc is written in Java under Apache-2.0; ReplicaDB is written in Java under Apache-2.0. flink-cdc has attracted 34% as many forks as stars, ReplicaDB 23%. flink-cdc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (elt, etl, kafka, mysql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

flink-cdc ★ 6.5K ReplicaDB ★ 500 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

flink-cdc ReplicaDB
GitHub stars ★ 6.5K ★ 500
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 114
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick flink-cdc if

  • You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full flink-cdc profile →

pick ReplicaDB if

  • You want the ReplicaDB feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and ReplicaDB fits your workflow better

full ReplicaDB profile →

About flink-cdc

Flink CDC is an Apache 2.0 streaming data integration tool built on Apache Flink that moves real time and batch data between databases and downstream systems, and it is aimed at data engineers and platform teams who need change data capture pipelines without writing per source job code.

read the full flink-cdc overview →

About ReplicaDB

ReplicaDB is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed command line tool written in Java that performs high performance bulk data replication between heterogeneous relational and non relational databases, and it is aimed at data engineers and operations teams who need repeatable batch transfers without installing database agents or triggers.

read the full ReplicaDB overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

airbyte vs cube airbyte vs shardingsphere cube vs shardingsphere airbyte vs debezium cube vs debezium shardingsphere vs debezium airbyte vs cocoindex cube vs cocoindex firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

flink-cdc vs Airbyte flink-cdc vs Cube flink-cdc vs shardingsphere flink-cdc vs debezium flink-cdc vs CocoIndex flink-cdc vs seatunnel flink-cdc vs steampipe flink-cdc vs realtime flink-cdc vs CloudQuery flink-cdc vs Lightdash flink-cdc vs fluvio flink-cdc vs whodb

Frequently asked questions

Is flink-cdc or ReplicaDB more popular?

flink-cdc has 6,477 GitHub stars and ReplicaDB has 500. flink-cdc has the larger community by that measure.

Are flink-cdc and ReplicaDB free?

Both are open source. flink-cdc is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ReplicaDB under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between flink-cdc and ReplicaDB?

flink-cdc is written in Java and ReplicaDB in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, flink-cdc or ReplicaDB?

Choose flink-cdc if you want the larger community (6,477 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ReplicaDB if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.