head to head · open source
firecrawl-mcp-server vs pdf_oxide
firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,764 GitHub stars, 928 forks, 136 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pdf_oxide has 1,168 stars, 149 forks, 322 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. firecrawl-mcp-server leads on adoption by 565% (7,764 vs 1,168 stars). firecrawl-mcp-server is written in JavaScript under MIT; pdf_oxide is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. firecrawl-mcp-server has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, pdf_oxide 13%. firecrawl-mcp-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| firecrawl-mcp-server | pdf_oxide | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.8K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 928 | ⑂ 149 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick firecrawl-mcp-server if
- You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pdf_oxide if
- You want the pdf_oxide feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and pdf_oxide fits your workflow better
About firecrawl-mcp-server
Firecrawl MCP Server A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that brings Firecrawl to MCP compatible AI agents — search, scrape, and interact with the live web for clean, agent ready context. Big thanks to @vrknetha, @knacklabs for the initial implementation! Features Search the web and get full page content Search an index built for coding agents: GitHub issues, merged pull requests, READMEs, and docs Scrape any URL into clean, structured data Interact with pages — click, navigate, and operate Deep research with autonomous agent Automatic retries and rate limiting Cloud and self hosted support SSE support Play…
read the full firecrawl-mcp-server overview →
About pdf_oxide
PDFOxide The Fastest PDF Toolkit for 20 Languages — Python, Rust, Go, JS/TS, C , Java, Kotlin, Swift, C++ & more, plus CLI & AI New in v0.3.69 — eleven new language bindings. PDFOxide now ships idiomatic bindings for C++, Swift, Kotlin, Dart, R, Julia, Zig, Scala, Clojure, Objective C, and Elixir , each built over the stable C ABI with its own CI workflow, api coverage tests, and runnable examples. That brings the toolkit to 20 languages (Rust core + 19 bindings). Want another language? Open an issue and tell us. The fastest PDF library for text extraction, image extraction, and markdown conversion. A Rust core…
read the full pdf_oxide overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is firecrawl-mcp-server or pdf_oxide more popular?
firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,764 GitHub stars and pdf_oxide has 1,168. firecrawl-mcp-server has the larger community by that measure.
Are firecrawl-mcp-server and pdf_oxide free?
Both are open source. firecrawl-mcp-server is licensed under MIT and pdf_oxide under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between firecrawl-mcp-server and pdf_oxide?
firecrawl-mcp-server is written in JavaScript and pdf_oxide in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, firecrawl-mcp-server or pdf_oxide?
Choose firecrawl-mcp-server if you want the larger community (7,764 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pdf_oxide if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.