head to head · open source

EasySpider vs firecrawl-mcp-server

EasySpider has 44,571 GitHub stars, 5,385 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,489 stars, 891 forks, 136 open issues and last shipped today. EasySpider leads on adoption by 495% (44,571 vs 7,489 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; firecrawl-mcp-server is written in JavaScript under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, firecrawl-mcp-server 12%. firecrawl-mcp-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (batch-processing, data-collection), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

EasySpider ★ 45K firecrawl-mcp-server ★ 7.5K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

EasySpider firecrawl-mcp-server
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 7.5K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 891
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick EasySpider if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full EasySpider profile →

pick firecrawl-mcp-server if

  • You want the firecrawl-mcp-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and firecrawl-mcp-server fits your workflow better

full firecrawl-mcp-server profile →

About EasySpider

EasySpider is a visual, code free web crawler and browser automation tool distributed on GitHub under the AGPL 3.0 license. It is written in JavaScript as a graphical application and lives in the web scraping and data extraction ecosystem, sitting alongside browser automation testing tools. It also carries the alias ServiceWrapper, described as an intelligent service encapsulation system for web applications. Development spans roughly six years, with the latest push recorded in September 2026.

read the full EasySpider overview →

About firecrawl-mcp-server

Firecrawl MCP Server is the official Model Context Protocol server that gives Cursor, Claude, and other MCP compatible AI clients search, scraping, and page interaction against the live web.

read the full firecrawl-mcp-server overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

EasySpider vs Browser Use EasySpider vs Crawl4AI EasySpider vs Scrapling EasySpider vs scrapy EasySpider vs Lightpanda EasySpider vs changedetection.io EasySpider vs lux EasySpider vs CloakBrowser EasySpider vs Scrapegraph-ai EasySpider vs crawlee EasySpider vs colly EasySpider vs stagehand

Frequently asked questions

Is EasySpider or firecrawl-mcp-server more popular?

EasySpider has 44,571 GitHub stars and firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,489. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.

Are EasySpider and firecrawl-mcp-server free?

Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and firecrawl-mcp-server under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between EasySpider and firecrawl-mcp-server?

EasySpider is written in JavaScript and firecrawl-mcp-server in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, EasySpider or firecrawl-mcp-server?

Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,571 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose firecrawl-mcp-server if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.