head to head · open source

Umami vs firebase-ios-sdk

Umami has 38,912 GitHub stars, 8,083 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped yesterday. firebase-ios-sdk has 6,661 stars, 1,789 forks, 444 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Umami leads on adoption by 484% (38,912 vs 6,661 stars). Umami is written in TypeScript under MIT; firebase-ios-sdk is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. Umami has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, firebase-ios-sdk 27%. Umami was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Umami ★ 39K firebase-ios-sdk ★ 6.7K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Umami firebase-ios-sdk
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 6.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 8.1K ⑂ 1.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Umami if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Umami profile →

pick firebase-ios-sdk if

  • You want the firebase-ios-sdk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and firebase-ios-sdk fits your workflow better

full firebase-ios-sdk profile →

About Umami

Umami is a privacy first, open source web and product analytics platform that gives site owners and product teams traffic, campaign, behavior, conversion and revenue reporting without cookies or surveillance, run either self hosted or in the cloud.

read the full Umami overview →

About firebase-ios-sdk

Firebase Apple Open Source Development is the open source repository that holds the source code for the Apple platform Firebase libraries, and it is intended for iOS and other Apple platform developers who build apps on the Firebase platform and want to read, build, or vendor that client code directly.

read the full firebase-ios-sdk overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

posthog vs umami umami vs plausible umami vs matomo grafana vs posthog sentry vs posthog posthog vs plausible posthog vs matomo posthog vs rybbit firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Umami vs PostHog Umami vs Plausible Umami vs Matomo Umami vs Rybbit Umami vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Umami vs Fathom Lite Umami vs Countly Umami vs shynet Umami vs tianji Umami vs OpenWebAnalytics Umami vs talivia Umami vs Aptabase

Frequently asked questions

Is Umami or firebase-ios-sdk more popular?

Umami has 38,912 GitHub stars and firebase-ios-sdk has 6,661. Umami has the larger community by that measure.

Are Umami and firebase-ios-sdk free?

Both are open source. Umami is licensed under MIT and firebase-ios-sdk under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Umami and firebase-ios-sdk?

Umami is written in TypeScript and firebase-ios-sdk in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Umami or firebase-ios-sdk?

Choose Umami if you want the larger community (38,912 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose firebase-ios-sdk if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.