head to head · open source
nanobot vs FastGPT
nanobot has 49,806 GitHub stars, 8,711 forks, 775 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FastGPT has 29,987 stars, 7,367 forks, 172 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nanobot leads on adoption by 66% (49,806 vs 29,987 stars). nanobot is written in Python under MIT; FastGPT is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. nanobot has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, FastGPT 25%. FastGPT was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| nanobot | FastGPT | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 30K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 7.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick nanobot if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FastGPT if
- You want the FastGPT feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and FastGPT fits your workflow better
About nanobot
English 简体中文 繁體中文 Español Français Bahasa Indonesia 日本語 한국어 Русский Tiếng Việt Discord · X · WeChat / Feishu nanobot 🐈 nanobot is an ultra lightweight, open source, self hosted personal AI agent framework written in Python. It runs in a WebUI, terminal, or chat apps and combines tools, long term memory, MCP integrations, model routing, multi agent delegation, scheduled automation, and an OpenAI compatible API in a small, readable core. Start Here What can nanobot do? nanobot is a self hosted personal AI agent runtime. It can: run in a browser WebUI or terminal connect to Telegram, Discord, Slack, WeChat, Email…
read the full nanobot overview →
About FastGPT
FastGPT English 简体中文 Bahasa Indonesia ไทย Tiếng Việt 日本語 FastGPT 是一个 AI Agent 构建平台，提供开箱即用的数据处理、模型调用等能力，同时可以通过 Flow 可视化进行工作流编排，从而实现复杂的应用场景。 快速开始 可以通过 Docker 快速启动 FastGPT，在终端输入以下命令，根据引导完成输入即可拉取配置。 bash 输入命令拉取配置文件 bash 💪 我们的项目 & 链接 快速开始本地开发 OpenAPI 文档 FastGPT plugin AI Proxy: 模型聚合负载均衡服务 Sealos：快速部署集群应用 🌿 第三方生态 AI Proxy：大模型聚合服务 SiliconCloud (硅基流动) —— 开源模型在线体验平台 🏘️ 社区交流群 扫码加入飞书话题群： 🤝 贡献者 我们非常欢迎各种形式的贡献。如果你对贡献代码感兴趣，可以查看我们的 GitHub Issues，大展身手，向我们展示你的奇思妙想。 🌟 Star History 使用协议 本仓库遵循 FastGPT Open Source License 开源协议。 1. 允许作为后台服务直接商用，但不允许提供 SaaS 服务。 2. 未经商业授权，任何形式的商用服务均需保留相关版权信息。 3. 完整请查看 FastGPT Open Source License 4…
read the full FastGPT overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is nanobot or FastGPT more popular?
nanobot has 49,806 GitHub stars and FastGPT has 29,987. nanobot has the larger community by that measure.
Are nanobot and FastGPT free?
Both are open source. nanobot is licensed under MIT, and FastGPT has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between nanobot and FastGPT?
nanobot is written in Python and FastGPT in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, nanobot or FastGPT?
Choose nanobot if you want the larger community (49,806 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose FastGPT if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.