head to head · open source
esbuild vs zeabur
esbuild has 40,120 GitHub stars, 1,368 forks, 622 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. zeabur has 742 stars, 114 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. esbuild leads on adoption by 5,307% (40,120 vs 742 stars). esbuild is written in Go under MIT; zeabur is written in HTML under MPL-2.0. esbuild has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, zeabur 15%. zeabur was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| esbuild | zeabur | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 40K | ★ 742 |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-08-09 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 114 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick esbuild if
- You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick zeabur if
- You want the zeabur feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and zeabur fits your workflow better
About esbuild
Website Getting started Documentation Plugins FAQ Why? Our current build tools for the web are 10 100x slower than they could be: The main goal of the esbuild bundler project is to bring about a new era of build tool performance, and create an easy to use modern bundler along the way. Major features: Extreme speed without needing a cache JavaScript, CSS, TypeScript, and JSX built in A straightforward API for CLI, JS, and Go Bundles ESM and CommonJS modules Bundles CSS including CSS modules Tree shaking, minification, and source maps Local server, watch mode, and plugins Check out the getting started instructions…
read the full esbuild overview →
About zeabur
Home · Documentation · Templates · Forum · Discord Your AI DevOps Engineer Zeabur handles all your deployment work so you can focus on your code. Tell your AI agent what you need — Zeabur deploys services, rents servers, manages domains, configures databases, and troubleshoots issues, all through natural language. No DevOps expertise required. Features AI Native Development Zeabur is built for AI centric workflows — deploy and operate your infrastructure directly from your AI tools. Claude Code Plugin — Zeabur's official Claude Code plugin converts natural language into infrastructure operations. Rent servers…
read the full zeabur overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is esbuild or zeabur more popular?
esbuild has 40,120 GitHub stars and zeabur has 742. esbuild has the larger community by that measure.
Are esbuild and zeabur free?
Both are open source. esbuild is licensed under MIT and zeabur under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between esbuild and zeabur?
esbuild is written in Go and zeabur in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, esbuild or zeabur?
Choose esbuild if you want the larger community (40,120 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zeabur if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.