head to head · open source

esbuild vs xmake

esbuild has 40,061 GitHub stars, 1,346 forks, 622 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. xmake has 12,222 stars, 954 forks, 255 open issues and last shipped yesterday. esbuild leads on adoption by 228% (40,061 vs 12,222 stars). esbuild is written in Go under MIT; xmake is written in Lua under Apache-2.0. esbuild has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, xmake 8%. xmake was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

esbuild ★ 40K xmake ★ 12K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

esbuild xmake
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 12K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Lua
Last push 2026-08-09 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 954
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick esbuild if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full esbuild profile →

pick xmake if

  • You want the xmake feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and xmake fits your workflow better

full xmake profile →

About esbuild

esbuild is an MIT licensed, Go based bundler for the web that compiles JavaScript, CSS, TypeScript, and JSX in one tool, aimed at front end developers and teams whose current web build pipelines are slower than they need to be.

read the full esbuild overview →

About xmake

Xmake is a cross platform build utility and package manager, written in Lua and licensed under Apache 2.0, that takes a single xmake.lua project file and turns it into builds for desktop, mobile, BSD, Wasm and other targets — it is aimed at C, C++, Objective C and mixed toolchain developers who want Make/Ninja style building, CMake/Meson style project generation, and Vcpkg/Conan style dependency handling from one tool.

read the full xmake overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

esbuild vs vite esbuild vs webpack esbuild vs Appwrite esbuild vs parcel esbuild vs Harness esbuild vs Dokku esbuild vs turborepo esbuild vs nx esbuild vs NocoBase esbuild vs gradle esbuild vs rspack esbuild vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is esbuild or xmake more popular?

esbuild has 40,061 GitHub stars and xmake has 12,222. esbuild has the larger community by that measure.

Are esbuild and xmake free?

Both are open source. esbuild is licensed under MIT and xmake under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between esbuild and xmake?

esbuild is written in Go and xmake in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, esbuild or xmake?

Choose esbuild if you want the larger community (40,061 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xmake if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.