head to head · open source

esbuild vs sandboxd

esbuild has 40,063 GitHub stars, 1,346 forks, 622 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. sandboxd has 946 stars, 60 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. esbuild leads on adoption by 4,135% (40,063 vs 946 stars). esbuild is written in Go under MIT; sandboxd is written in Go under MIT. esbuild has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, sandboxd 6%. sandboxd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

esbuild ★ 40K sandboxd ★ 946 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

esbuild sandboxd
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 946
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-08-09 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 60
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick esbuild if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full esbuild profile →

pick sandboxd if

  • You want the sandboxd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and sandboxd fits your workflow better

full sandboxd profile →

About esbuild

esbuild is an MIT licensed, Go based bundler for the web that compiles JavaScript, CSS, TypeScript, and JSX in one tool, aimed at front end developers and teams whose current web build pipelines are slower than they need to be.

read the full esbuild overview →

About sandboxd

sandboxd is an open source, self hosted AI app builder that runs a coding agent inside isolated sandboxes on your own server and gives every generated app its own live preview URL, and it is built for developers and teams who want the prompt to app workflow of hosted builders without giving up their infrastructure, code, or data.

read the full sandboxd overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

esbuild vs vite esbuild vs webpack esbuild vs Appwrite esbuild vs parcel esbuild vs Harness esbuild vs Dokku esbuild vs turborepo esbuild vs nx esbuild vs NocoBase esbuild vs gradle esbuild vs rspack esbuild vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is esbuild or sandboxd more popular?

esbuild has 40,063 GitHub stars and sandboxd has 946. esbuild has the larger community by that measure.

Are esbuild and sandboxd free?

Both are open source. esbuild is licensed under MIT and sandboxd under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between esbuild and sandboxd?

esbuild is written in Go and sandboxd in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, esbuild or sandboxd?

Choose esbuild if you want the larger community (40,063 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose sandboxd if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.