head to head · open source

esbuild vs proguard

esbuild has 40,063 GitHub stars, 1,346 forks, 622 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. proguard has 3,664 stars, 485 forks, 176 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. esbuild leads on adoption by 993% (40,063 vs 3,664 stars). esbuild is written in Go under MIT; proguard is written in Java under GPL-2.0. esbuild has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, proguard 13%. proguard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

esbuild ★ 40K proguard ★ 3.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

esbuild proguard
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 3.7K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-08-09 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 485
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick esbuild if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full esbuild profile →

pick proguard if

  • You want the proguard feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and proguard fits your workflow better

full proguard profile →

About esbuild

esbuild is an MIT licensed, Go based bundler for the web that compiles JavaScript, CSS, TypeScript, and JSX in one tool, aimed at front end developers and teams whose current web build pipelines are slower than they need to be.

read the full esbuild overview →

About proguard

ProGuard is a free Java bytecode tool that shrinks, optimizes, obfuscates, and preverifies compiled Java applications and libraries. It lives in the Java and Android build ecosystem as a post compiler step, not as a source compiler or runtime dependency. The problem it solves is that Java bytecode often contains classes, fields, methods, attributes, and instructions that a specific application does not need. ProGuard removes unused parts, renames remaining program elements with short meaningless names, and applies optimizations such as method inlining, constant propagation, unused parameter removal, and identifie…

read the full proguard overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

esbuild vs vite esbuild vs webpack esbuild vs Appwrite esbuild vs parcel esbuild vs Harness esbuild vs Dokku esbuild vs turborepo esbuild vs nx esbuild vs NocoBase esbuild vs gradle esbuild vs rspack esbuild vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is esbuild or proguard more popular?

esbuild has 40,063 GitHub stars and proguard has 3,664. esbuild has the larger community by that measure.

Are esbuild and proguard free?

Both are open source. esbuild is licensed under MIT and proguard under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between esbuild and proguard?

esbuild is written in Go and proguard in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, esbuild or proguard?

Choose esbuild if you want the larger community (40,063 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose proguard if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.