head to head · open source

esbuild vs extension.js

esbuild has 40,063 GitHub stars, 1,346 forks, 622 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. extension.js has 5,164 stars, 139 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped today. esbuild leads on adoption by 676% (40,063 vs 5,164 stars). esbuild is written in Go under MIT; extension.js is written in TypeScript under MIT. esbuild has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, extension.js 3%. extension.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

esbuild ★ 40K extension.js ★ 5.2K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

esbuild extension.js
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 5.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-09 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 139
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick esbuild if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full esbuild profile →

pick extension.js if

  • You want the extension.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and extension.js fits your workflow better

full extension.js profile →

About esbuild

esbuild is an MIT licensed, Go based bundler for the web that compiles JavaScript, CSS, TypeScript, and JSX in one tool, aimed at front end developers and teams whose current web build pipelines are slower than they need to be.

read the full esbuild overview →

About extension.js

extension.js is an open source cross browser extension framework written in TypeScript under the MIT license. It targets Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari, and it lets developers build extensions without a separate build configuration for each browser.

read the full extension.js overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

esbuild vs vite esbuild vs webpack esbuild vs Appwrite esbuild vs parcel esbuild vs Harness esbuild vs Dokku esbuild vs turborepo esbuild vs nx esbuild vs NocoBase esbuild vs gradle esbuild vs rspack esbuild vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is esbuild or extension.js more popular?

esbuild has 40,063 GitHub stars and extension.js has 5,164. esbuild has the larger community by that measure.

Are esbuild and extension.js free?

Both are open source. esbuild is licensed under MIT and extension.js under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between esbuild and extension.js?

esbuild is written in Go and extension.js in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, esbuild or extension.js?

Choose esbuild if you want the larger community (40,063 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose extension.js if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.