head to head · open source

esbuild vs corrosion

esbuild has 40,063 GitHub stars, 1,346 forks, 622 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. corrosion has 1,498 stars, 150 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. esbuild leads on adoption by 2,574% (40,063 vs 1,498 stars). esbuild is written in Go under MIT; corrosion is written in CMake under MIT. esbuild has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, corrosion 10%. esbuild was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

esbuild ★ 40K corrosion ★ 1.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

esbuild corrosion
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go CMake
Last push 2026-08-09 2026-05-16
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 150
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick esbuild if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full esbuild profile →

pick corrosion if

  • You want the corrosion feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CMake
  • You evaluated both and corrosion fits your workflow better

full corrosion profile →

About esbuild

esbuild is an MIT licensed, Go based bundler for the web that compiles JavaScript, CSS, TypeScript, and JSX in one tool, aimed at front end developers and teams whose current web build pipelines are slower than they need to be.

read the full esbuild overview →

About corrosion

Corrosion is an MIT licensed CMake package that imports Rust executables, static libraries, and dynamic libraries into an existing CMake build from a Cargo workspace or package manifest, and it is aimed at C and C++ teams that already build with CMake and want to add Rust code without replacing their build system.

read the full corrosion overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

esbuild vs vite esbuild vs webpack esbuild vs Appwrite esbuild vs parcel esbuild vs Harness esbuild vs Dokku esbuild vs turborepo esbuild vs nx esbuild vs NocoBase esbuild vs gradle esbuild vs rspack esbuild vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is esbuild or corrosion more popular?

esbuild has 40,063 GitHub stars and corrosion has 1,498. esbuild has the larger community by that measure.

Are esbuild and corrosion free?

Both are open source. esbuild is licensed under MIT and corrosion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between esbuild and corrosion?

esbuild is written in Go and corrosion in CMake. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, esbuild or corrosion?

Choose esbuild if you want the larger community (40,063 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose corrosion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.