head to head · open source

ERPNext vs TimeTracker

ERPNext has 39,605 GitHub stars, 12,966 forks, 1,822 open issues and last shipped today. TimeTracker has 628 stars, 68 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ERPNext leads on adoption by 6,207% (39,605 vs 628 stars). ERPNext is written in Python under GPL-3.0; TimeTracker is written in Python under GPL-3.0. ERPNext has attracted 33% as many forks as stars, TimeTracker 11%. ERPNext was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ERPNext ★ 40K TimeTracker ★ 628 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ERPNext TimeTracker
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 628
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-28 2026-09-27
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 68
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ERPNext if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ERPNext profile →

pick TimeTracker if

  • You want the TimeTracker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and TimeTracker fits your workflow better

full TimeTracker profile →

About ERPNext

ERPNext is a free and open source Enterprise Resource Planning system built on the Frappe Framework. It unifies core business functions—including accounting, procurement, manufacturing, CRM, HRMS, and asset management—into a single platform, eliminating the need for multiple proprietary tools. The project lives in the Python based Frappe ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0.

read the full ERPNext overview →

About TimeTracker

TimeTracker is a self hosted, web based time tracking and invoicing application, released under the GPL 3.0 and built on Python and Flask, for freelancers, small teams, agencies and privacy focused organisations that want Toggl or Clockify style timers, project management and client billing while keeping their data on their own infrastructure.

read the full TimeTracker overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 58K Odoo ★ 55K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

erpnext vs midday erpnext vs aureuserp erpnext vs frappe erpnext vs lago erpnext vs polar erpnext vs akaunting erpnext vs invoice-ninja erpnext vs idurar-erp-crm odoo vs erpnext opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly

More Finance & Accounting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Finance & Accounting field.

ERPNext vs Midday ERPNext vs aureuserp ERPNext vs Lago ERPNext vs Polar ERPNext vs Akaunting ERPNext vs Invoice Ninja ERPNext vs idurar-erp-crm ERPNext vs TaxHacker ERPNext vs Expensify ERPNext vs Frappe Books ERPNext vs hledger ERPNext vs personal-management-system

Frequently asked questions

Is ERPNext or TimeTracker more popular?

ERPNext has 39,605 GitHub stars and TimeTracker has 628. ERPNext has the larger community by that measure.

Are ERPNext and TimeTracker free?

Both are open source. ERPNext is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TimeTracker under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ERPNext and TimeTracker?

ERPNext is written in Python and TimeTracker in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ERPNext or TimeTracker?

Choose ERPNext if you want the larger community (39,605 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose TimeTracker if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.