head to head · open source
ERPNext vs TimeTracker
ERPNext has 41,238 GitHub stars, 13,503 forks, 1,822 open issues and last shipped yesterday. TimeTracker has 641 stars, 82 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ERPNext leads on adoption by 6,333% (41,238 vs 641 stars). ERPNext is written in Python under GPL-3.0; TimeTracker is written in Python under GPL-3.0. ERPNext has attracted 33% as many forks as stars, TimeTracker 13%. ERPNext was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ERPNext | TimeTracker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 41K | ★ 641 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 82 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ERPNext if
- You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick TimeTracker if
- You want the TimeTracker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and TimeTracker fits your workflow better
About ERPNext
ERPNext Powerful, Intuitive and Open Source ERP Live Demo Website Documentation ERPNext 100% Open Source ERP System to help you run your business. Motivation Running a business is a complex task handling invoices, tracking stock, managing personnel, and other daily operations. In a market where software is sold separately to manage each of these tasks, ERPNext does all of the above and more, for free. Key Features Accounting : All the tools you need to manage cash flow in one place, right from recording transactions to summarizing and analyzing financial reports. Order Management : Track inventory levels…
read the full ERPNext overview →
About TimeTracker
TimeTracker Self hosted time tracking, invoicing and Peppol e invoicing for freelancers and teams — with no per seat fees. Live demo · Website · Docs · Changelog Quick start (60 seconds) No git clone, no certificate warning — plain HTTP on port 8080 with bundled PostgreSQL: Latest release: v5.18.0 — see CHANGELOG.md. More install paths (HTTPS production, NAS UI paste, cloud): Install options. Why TimeTracker? Peppol & EN 16931 e invoicing — Send invoices yourself via the bundled Peppol Bridge; embed Factur X / ZUGFeRD XML in PDFs. No paid SaaS middleman for e invoicing. Self hosted — Your timers, clients, and…
read the full TimeTracker overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Finance & Accounting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Finance & Accounting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ERPNext or TimeTracker more popular?
ERPNext has 41,238 GitHub stars and TimeTracker has 641. ERPNext has the larger community by that measure.
Are ERPNext and TimeTracker free?
Both are open source. ERPNext is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TimeTracker under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ERPNext and TimeTracker?
ERPNext is written in Python and TimeTracker in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ERPNext or TimeTracker?
Choose ERPNext if you want the larger community (41,238 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose TimeTracker if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.