head to head · open source
ecapture vs airgorah
ecapture has 15,490 GitHub stars, 1,647 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. airgorah has 3,923 stars, 680 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ecapture leads on adoption by 295% (15,490 vs 3,923 stars). ecapture is written in C under Apache-2.0; airgorah is written in Rust under MIT. ecapture has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, airgorah 17%. ecapture was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (security-audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ecapture | airgorah | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | C | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 680 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ecapture if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick airgorah if
- You want the airgorah feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and airgorah fits your workflow better
About ecapture
eCapture (旁观者) is an open source eBPF tool that captures SSL/TLS plaintext, database queries, and shell history on Linux and Android for security auditors, network engineers, and self hosters who need visibility into encrypted traffic without intercepting it.
read the full ecapture overview →
About airgorah
Airgorah is a WiFi security auditing application written in Rust with a GTK4 graphical interface, built for Linux users such as penetration testers, wireless auditors and security engineers who assess networks they own or are authorised to test.
read the full airgorah overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ecapture or airgorah more popular?
ecapture has 15,490 GitHub stars and airgorah has 3,923. ecapture has the larger community by that measure.
Are ecapture and airgorah free?
Both are open source. ecapture is licensed under Apache-2.0 and airgorah under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ecapture and airgorah?
ecapture is written in C and airgorah in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ecapture or airgorah?
Choose ecapture if you want the larger community (15,490 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose airgorah if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.