head to head · open source
EasySpider vs stealth-browser-mcp
EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars, 5,387 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. stealth-browser-mcp has 2,075 stars, 289 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. EasySpider leads on adoption by 2,048% (44,565 vs 2,075 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; stealth-browser-mcp is written in Python under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, stealth-browser-mcp 14%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | stealth-browser-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 289 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick stealth-browser-mcp if
- You want the stealth-browser-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and stealth-browser-mcp fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
EasySpider is a visual, code free web crawler and browser automation tool distributed on GitHub under the AGPL 3.0 license. It is written in JavaScript as a graphical application and lives in the web scraping and data extraction ecosystem, sitting alongside browser automation testing tools. It also carries the alias ServiceWrapper, described as an intelligent service encapsulation system for web applications. Development spans roughly six years, with the latest push recorded in September 2026.
read the full EasySpider overview →
About stealth-browser-mcp
Stealth Browser MCP Stealth browser automation for MCP compatible AI agents. Navigate Cloudflare challenges, anti bot checks, and login walls with real Chrome family browser instances powered by nodriver, Chrome DevTools Protocol, and FastMCP. Sponsors NodeMaven — The most efficient proxy provider for Web Scraping and Automation with the Highest Quality IP on the market. Why NodeMaven? ZIP targeting 99.9% uptime IP filtering: all proxies have fraud score RapidProxy powers scraping and automation with 90M+ residential IPs across 200+ countries, supporting rotation, geo targeting, and high concurrency to improve su…
read the full stealth-browser-mcp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or stealth-browser-mcp more popular?
EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars and stealth-browser-mcp has 2,075. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and stealth-browser-mcp free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and stealth-browser-mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and stealth-browser-mcp?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and stealth-browser-mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or stealth-browser-mcp?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,565 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose stealth-browser-mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.