head to head · open source

duckdb vs OpenSearch-Dashboards

duckdb has 42,747 GitHub stars, 4,176 forks, 858 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenSearch-Dashboards has 2,142 stars, 1,294 forks, 1,636 open issues and last shipped yesterday. duckdb leads on adoption by 1,896% (42,747 vs 2,142 stars). duckdb is written in C++ under MIT; OpenSearch-Dashboards is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. duckdb has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, OpenSearch-Dashboards 60%. duckdb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

duckdb ★ 43K OpenSearch-Dashboards ★ 2.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

duckdb OpenSearch-Dashboards
GitHub stars ★ 43K ★ 2.1K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick duckdb if

  • You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full duckdb profile →

pick OpenSearch-Dashboards if

  • You want the OpenSearch-Dashboards feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and OpenSearch-Dashboards fits your workflow better

full OpenSearch-Dashboards profile →

About duckdb

DuckDB DuckDB is a high performance analytical database system. It is designed to be fast, reliable, portable, and easy to use. DuckDB provides a rich SQL dialect with support far beyond basic SQL. DuckDB supports arbitrary and nested correlated subqueries, window functions, collations, complex types (arrays, structs, maps), and several extensions designed to make SQL easier to use. DuckDB is available as a standalone CLI application and has clients for Python, R, Java, Wasm, etc., with deep integrations with packages such as pandas and dplyr. For more information on using DuckDB, please refer to the DuckDB…

read the full duckdb overview →

About OpenSearch-Dashboards

Welcome! Project Resources Code of Conduct License Copyright Welcome OpenSearch Dashboards is an open source data visualization tool designed to work with OpenSearch. OpenSearch Dashboards gives you data visualization tools to improve and automate business intelligence and support data driven decision making and strategic planning. We aim to be an exceptional community driven platform and to foster open participation and collective contribution with all contributors. Stay up to date on what's happening with the OpenSearch Project by tracking GitHub issues and pull requests. You can contribute to this project by…

read the full OpenSearch-Dashboards overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Frequently asked questions

Is duckdb or OpenSearch-Dashboards more popular?

duckdb has 42,747 GitHub stars and OpenSearch-Dashboards has 2,142. duckdb has the larger community by that measure.

Are duckdb and OpenSearch-Dashboards free?

Both are open source. duckdb is licensed under MIT and OpenSearch-Dashboards under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between duckdb and OpenSearch-Dashboards?

duckdb is written in C++ and OpenSearch-Dashboards in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, duckdb or OpenSearch-Dashboards?

Choose duckdb if you want the larger community (42,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenSearch-Dashboards if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.