head to head · open source
duckdb vs Contentport
duckdb has 42,747 GitHub stars, 4,176 forks, 858 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Contentport has 772 stars, 108 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. duckdb leads on adoption by 5,437% (42,747 vs 772 stars). duckdb is written in C++ under MIT; Contentport is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. duckdb has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Contentport 14%. duckdb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| duckdb | Contentport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 43K | ★ 772 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2025-12-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 108 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick duckdb if
- You weight community size — 43K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Contentport if
- You want the Contentport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Contentport fits your workflow better
About duckdb
DuckDB DuckDB is a high performance analytical database system. It is designed to be fast, reliable, portable, and easy to use. DuckDB provides a rich SQL dialect with support far beyond basic SQL. DuckDB supports arbitrary and nested correlated subqueries, window functions, collations, complex types (arrays, structs, maps), and several extensions designed to make SQL easier to use. DuckDB is available as a standalone CLI application and has clients for Python, R, Java, Wasm, etc., with deep integrations with packages such as pandas and dplyr. For more information on using DuckDB, please refer to the DuckDB…
read the full duckdb overview →
About Contentport
contentport — public roadmap (last updated: 29th Nov 2025) Features in Pipeline Priority 1 Dark mode (requested by many users) Responsive layout (requested by many users) Community posting (requested by many users) Proactively create posts for users (requested by many users) Native code snippet editor (Raycast style) — personal wish (Jo) Accurate character limit handling for free Twitter users (necessary for UX) Auto plug (potentially useful feature) Timezone selection (requested by many users) Clarify whether scheduled times reflect: Local timezone UTC Or something else Display the active timezone clearly…
read the full Contentport overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.
Frequently asked questions
Is duckdb or Contentport more popular?
duckdb has 42,747 GitHub stars and Contentport has 772. duckdb has the larger community by that measure.
Are duckdb and Contentport free?
Both are open source. duckdb is licensed under MIT and Contentport under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between duckdb and Contentport?
duckdb is written in C++ and Contentport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, duckdb or Contentport?
Choose duckdb if you want the larger community (42,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Contentport if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.