head to head · open source
Douyin_TikTok_Download_API vs webmagic
Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has 21,112 GitHub stars, 2,938 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webmagic has 11,670 stars, 4,085 forks, 367 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API leads on adoption by 81% (21,112 vs 11,670 stars). Douyin_TikTok_Download_API is written in Python under Apache-2.0; webmagic is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, webmagic 35%. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Douyin_TikTok_Download_API | webmagic | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 12K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2025-12-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 4.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Douyin_TikTok_Download_API if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick webmagic if
- You want the webmagic feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and webmagic fits your workflow better
About Douyin_TikTok_Download_API
Douyin TikTok Download API English 简体中文 🚀 A self hosted data API for Douyin and TikTok. One docker compose up , an identity pool that maintains itself, and a REST API, MCP server and web console on top. Open source, free, and it runs on your own machine — no signup, no quota, nobody else in the path. It fetches posts, authors, comments and search, downloads video and image albums without a watermark (it picks the clean stream the platform already publishes rather than stripping anything), and keeps what it collects in your own PostgreSQL. 💖 Sponsors These sponsors paid to be here, and Douyin TikTok Download…
read the full Douyin_TikTok_Download_API overview →
About webmagic
Readme in Chinese A scalable crawler framework. It covers the whole lifecycle of crawler: downloading, url management, content extraction and persistent. It can simplify the development of a specific crawler. Features: Simple core with high flexibility. Simple API for html extracting. Annotation with POJO to customize a crawler, no configuration. Multi thread and Distribution support. Easy to be integrated. Install: Add dependencies to your pom.xml: WebMagic use slf4j with slf4j log4j12 implementation. If you customized your slf4j implementation, please exclude slf4j log4j12. Get Started: First crawler: Write a…
read the full webmagic overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Douyin_TikTok_Download_API or webmagic more popular?
Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has 21,112 GitHub stars and webmagic has 11,670. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has the larger community by that measure.
Are Douyin_TikTok_Download_API and webmagic free?
Both are open source. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API is licensed under Apache-2.0 and webmagic under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Douyin_TikTok_Download_API and webmagic?
Douyin_TikTok_Download_API is written in Python and webmagic in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Douyin_TikTok_Download_API or webmagic?
Choose Douyin_TikTok_Download_API if you want the larger community (21,112 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose webmagic if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.