head to head · open source
Douyin_TikTok_Download_API vs camofox-browser
Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has 21,112 GitHub stars, 2,938 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. camofox-browser has 12,121 stars, 1,225 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API leads on adoption by 74% (21,112 vs 12,121 stars). Douyin_TikTok_Download_API is written in Python under Apache-2.0; camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, camofox-browser 10%. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Douyin_TikTok_Download_API | camofox-browser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 12K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 1.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Douyin_TikTok_Download_API if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick camofox-browser if
- You want the camofox-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and camofox-browser fits your workflow better
About Douyin_TikTok_Download_API
Douyin TikTok Download API English 简体中文 🚀 A self hosted data API for Douyin and TikTok. One docker compose up , an identity pool that maintains itself, and a REST API, MCP server and web console on top. Open source, free, and it runs on your own machine — no signup, no quota, nobody else in the path. It fetches posts, authors, comments and search, downloads video and image albums without a watermark (it picks the clean stream the platform already publishes rather than stripping anything), and keeps what it collects in your own PostgreSQL. 💖 Sponsors These sponsors paid to be here, and Douyin TikTok Download…
read the full Douyin_TikTok_Download_API overview →
About camofox-browser
camofox browser Anti detection browser server for AI agents, powered by Camoufox Standing on the mighty shoulders of Camoufox a Firefox fork with fingerprint spoofing at the C++ level. Built by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent that runs half on your Mac, half on a dedicated cloud machine just for you with zero maintenance needed. Available on macOS, Telegram, WhatsApp, and email. Try the beta free Pradeep Elankumaran (@pradeep24) — co founder and technical CEO at Jo. Why AI agents need to browse the real web. Playwright gets blocked. Headless Chrome gets fingerprinted. Stealth plugins become the…
read the full camofox-browser overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Douyin_TikTok_Download_API or camofox-browser more popular?
Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has 21,112 GitHub stars and camofox-browser has 12,121. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API has the larger community by that measure.
Are Douyin_TikTok_Download_API and camofox-browser free?
Both are open source. Douyin_TikTok_Download_API is licensed under Apache-2.0 and camofox-browser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Douyin_TikTok_Download_API and camofox-browser?
Douyin_TikTok_Download_API is written in Python and camofox-browser in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Douyin_TikTok_Download_API or camofox-browser?
Choose Douyin_TikTok_Download_API if you want the larger community (21,112 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose camofox-browser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.