head to head · open source
dots vs stealth-browser-mcp
dots has 32,357 GitHub stars, 4,739 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. stealth-browser-mcp has 3,319 stars, 410 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dots leads on adoption by 875% (32,357 vs 3,319 stars). dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; stealth-browser-mcp is written in Python under MIT. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, stealth-browser-mcp 12%. stealth-browser-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| dots | stealth-browser-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.7K | ⑂ 410 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick dots if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick stealth-browser-mcp if
- You want the stealth-browser-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and stealth-browser-mcp fits your workflow better
About dots
dots Every AI agent is a model and a browser. You can swap the model with one flag. The browser is what the website sees. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open The conversation on the left, the browser on the right, live. It all comes down to the browser When a web agent fails, the model is rarely why. The page never loaded, a challenge appeared, the login expired, the click did not land. All of that happens in the browser, before the model gets to think. So dots is built around one: A real Firefox engine, patched in C++. The fingerprint is decided inside the engine, not painted over with JavaScript that a…
About stealth-browser-mcp
Stealth Browser MCP Stealth browser automation for MCP compatible AI agents. Navigate Cloudflare challenges, anti bot checks, and login walls with real Chrome family browser instances powered by nodriver, Chrome DevTools Protocol, and FastMCP. Sponsors NodeMaven — The most efficient proxy provider for Web Scraping and Automation with the Highest Quality IP on the market. Why NodeMaven? ZIP targeting 99.9% uptime IP filtering: all proxies have fraud score RapidProxy powers scraping and automation with 90M+ residential IPs across 200+ countries, supporting rotation, geo targeting, and high concurrency to improve…
read the full stealth-browser-mcp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is dots or stealth-browser-mcp more popular?
dots has 32,357 GitHub stars and stealth-browser-mcp has 3,319. dots has the larger community by that measure.
Are dots and stealth-browser-mcp free?
Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and stealth-browser-mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between dots and stealth-browser-mcp?
dots is written in TypeScript and stealth-browser-mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, dots or stealth-browser-mcp?
Choose dots if you want the larger community (32,357 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose stealth-browser-mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.