head to head · open source
dots vs ff-ruyijs
dots has 32,357 GitHub stars, 4,739 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ff-ruyijs has 537 stars, 274 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dots leads on adoption by 5,926% (32,357 vs 537 stars). dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; ff-ruyijs is written in C++ under AGPL-3.0. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, ff-ruyijs 51%. ff-ruyijs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| dots | ff-ruyijs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 537 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.7K | ⑂ 274 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick dots if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ff-ruyijs if
- You want the ff-ruyijs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and ff-ruyijs fits your workflow better
About dots
dots Every AI agent is a model and a browser. You can swap the model with one flag. The browser is what the website sees. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open The conversation on the left, the browser on the right, live. It all comes down to the browser When a web agent fails, the model is rarely why. The page never loaded, a challenge appeared, the login expired, the click did not land. All of that happens in the browser, before the model gets to think. So dots is built around one: A real Firefox engine, patched in C++. The fingerprint is decided inside the engine, not painted over with JavaScript that a…
About ff-ruyijs
🦊 ruyiJS Run any site's JavaScript from Python — with the real Firefox engine. A new generation, minimalist browser purpose built for AI driven automation. The authentic Firefox JavaScript engine and networking stack, with no window and no renderer — made for web scraping, JS reverse engineering, data collection, and getting past bot checks. Sponsored by Contributors Install · Features · Verification systems · Examples · FAQ · Contact · LinuxDO · English · 简体中文 ⚠️ Disclaimer: This project is for researching next generation AI browsers. Any form of brute force reverse engineering is strictly rejected. The source…
read the full ff-ruyijs overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is dots or ff-ruyijs more popular?
dots has 32,357 GitHub stars and ff-ruyijs has 537. dots has the larger community by that measure.
Are dots and ff-ruyijs free?
Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and ff-ruyijs under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between dots and ff-ruyijs?
dots is written in TypeScript and ff-ruyijs in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, dots or ff-ruyijs?
Choose dots if you want the larger community (32,357 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ff-ruyijs if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.