head to head · open source

Dokku vs style-dictionary

Dokku has 32,147 GitHub stars, 2,075 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped yesterday. style-dictionary has 4,819 stars, 628 forks, 242 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Dokku leads on adoption by 567% (32,147 vs 4,819 stars). Dokku is written in Go under MIT; style-dictionary is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Dokku has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, style-dictionary 13%. Dokku was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Dokku ★ 32K style-dictionary ★ 4.8K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Dokku style-dictionary
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 4.8K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 628
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Dokku if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Dokku profile →

pick style-dictionary if

  • You want the style-dictionary feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and style-dictionary fits your workflow better

full style-dictionary profile →

About Dokku

Dokku is a self hosted Platform as a Service (PaaS) that runs on a single server using Docker containers. It enables developers to deploy applications using familiar workflows like git push , mimicking the simplicity of Heroku while running entirely under the user’s control. Dokku lives in the DevOps and infrastructure automation ecosystem, targeting teams that want PaaS convenience without relying on cloud vendor lock in.

read the full Dokku overview →

About style-dictionary

Style Dictionary is a JavaScript build system that turns design tokens into cross platform style definitions for iOS, Android, CSS, JavaScript, HTML, and Sketch, aimed at design system teams and developers who need one source of truth for styles instead of hand maintained files per platform.

read the full style-dictionary overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs dokku openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Dokku vs vite Dokku vs webpack Dokku vs Appwrite Dokku vs parcel Dokku vs esbuild Dokku vs Harness Dokku vs turborepo Dokku vs nx Dokku vs NocoBase Dokku vs gradle Dokku vs rspack Dokku vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is Dokku or style-dictionary more popular?

Dokku has 32,147 GitHub stars and style-dictionary has 4,819. Dokku has the larger community by that measure.

Are Dokku and style-dictionary free?

Both are open source. Dokku is licensed under MIT and style-dictionary under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Dokku and style-dictionary?

Dokku is written in Go and style-dictionary in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Dokku or style-dictionary?

Choose Dokku if you want the larger community (32,147 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose style-dictionary if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.