head to head · open source
docusaurus vs wikiteam
docusaurus has 66,641 GitHub stars, 10,125 forks, 430 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wikiteam has 876 stars, 177 forks, 171 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. docusaurus leads on adoption by 7,507% (66,641 vs 876 stars). docusaurus is written in TypeScript under MIT; wikiteam is written in Python under GPL-3.0. docusaurus has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, wikiteam 20%. docusaurus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| docusaurus | wikiteam | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 876 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-01-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 10K | ⑂ 177 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick docusaurus if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wikiteam if
- You want the wikiteam feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and wikiteam fits your workflow better
About docusaurus
Docusaurus Introduction Docusaurus is a project for building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites easily. Short on time? Check out our 5 minute tutorial ⏱️! Tip : use docusaurus.new to test Docusaurus immediately in a playground. Simple to Start Docusaurus is built in a way so that it can get running in as little time as possible. We've built Docusaurus to handle the website build process so you can focus on your project. Localizable Docusaurus ships with localization support via CrowdIn. Empower and grow your international community by translating your documentation. Customizable While…
read the full docusaurus overview →
About wikiteam
WikiTeam We archive wikis, from Wikipedia to tiniest wikis WikiTeam software is a set of tools for archiving wikis. They work on MediaWiki wikis, but we want to expand to other wiki engines. As of 2026, WikiTeam has preserved more than 600,000 wikis, several wikifarms, regular Wikipedia dumps and 34 TB of Wikimedia Commons images. There are thousands of wikis in the Internet. Every day some of them are no longer publicly available and, due to lack of backups, lost forever. Millions of people download tons of media files (movies, music, books, etc) from the Internet, serving as a kind of distributed backup…
read the full wikiteam overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.
Frequently asked questions
Is docusaurus or wikiteam more popular?
docusaurus has 66,641 GitHub stars and wikiteam has 876. docusaurus has the larger community by that measure.
Are docusaurus and wikiteam free?
Both are open source. docusaurus is licensed under MIT and wikiteam under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between docusaurus and wikiteam?
docusaurus is written in TypeScript and wikiteam in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, docusaurus or wikiteam?
Choose docusaurus if you want the larger community (66,641 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wikiteam if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.