head to head · open source

docsify vs Fumadocs

docsify has 31,513 GitHub stars, 5,789 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fumadocs has 13,171 stars, 730 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. docsify leads on adoption by 139% (31,513 vs 13,171 stars). docsify is written in JavaScript under MIT; Fumadocs is written in TypeScript under MIT. docsify has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, Fumadocs 6%. Fumadocs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

docsify ★ 32K Fumadocs ★ 13K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

docsify Fumadocs
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 730
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick docsify if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full docsify profile →

pick Fumadocs if

  • You want the Fumadocs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Fumadocs fits your workflow better

full Fumadocs profile →

About docsify

Docsify is a client side documentation site generator that turns one or more Markdown files into a website with no build process, aimed at developers and maintainers who want to publish documentation from a static host such as GitHub Pages.

read the full docsify overview →

About Fumadocs

Fumadocs is a documentation framework for React.js and Astro. It is written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license. The project targets documentation websites. It lives in the React.js and Astro documentation ecosystem. The supplied registry category is Content & Publishing / Documentation & Knowledge Base. The supplied repository metadata lists 13,134 stars and 728 forks. The supplied repository age is 0 years, and the last push timestamp is 2026 09 14T12:45:01Z.

read the full Fumadocs overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs docsify storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs wiki next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

docsify vs storybook docsify vs Understand-Anything docsify vs devdocs docsify vs wiki docsify vs mkdocs-material docsify vs BookStack docsify vs deepwiki-open docsify vs Docs docsify vs jsdoc docsify vs Skill_Seekers docsify vs gollum docsify vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is docsify or Fumadocs more popular?

docsify has 31,513 GitHub stars and Fumadocs has 13,171. docsify has the larger community by that measure.

Are docsify and Fumadocs free?

Both are open source. docsify is licensed under MIT and Fumadocs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between docsify and Fumadocs?

docsify is written in JavaScript and Fumadocs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, docsify or Fumadocs?

Choose docsify if you want the larger community (31,513 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fumadocs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.