head to head · open source

docsify vs ctx

docsify has 31,513 GitHub stars, 5,789 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ctx has 587 stars, 71 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. docsify leads on adoption by 5,268% (31,513 vs 587 stars). docsify is written in JavaScript under MIT; ctx is written in Python under MIT. docsify has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, ctx 12%. docsify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

docsify ★ 32K ctx ★ 587 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

docsify ctx
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 587
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-31
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 71
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick docsify if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full docsify profile →

pick ctx if

  • You want the ctx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ctx fits your workflow better

full ctx profile →

About docsify

Docsify is a client side documentation site generator that turns one or more Markdown files into a website with no build process, aimed at developers and maintainers who want to publish documentation from a static host such as GitHub Pages.

read the full docsify overview →

About ctx

ctx Find the cheapest AI coding setup that actually works on your repo. CTX Fit analyzes your repository, tests promising AI coding configurations against real tasks in it, and produces the winning configuration as a reviewable change — in your working tree with apply , or as a pull request with pr . It picks the cheapest setup that reliably works — reliability is a requirement, not a tie break — and if nothing beats what you already have, it says so. The winner is chosen by a fixed rule, not a score: discard every candidate below the reliability floor, then minimize attributable cost, then break ties toward the …

read the full ctx overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs docsify storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs wiki next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

docsify vs storybook docsify vs Understand-Anything docsify vs devdocs docsify vs wiki docsify vs mkdocs-material docsify vs BookStack docsify vs deepwiki-open docsify vs Docs docsify vs jsdoc docsify vs Skill_Seekers docsify vs gollum docsify vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is docsify or ctx more popular?

docsify has 31,513 GitHub stars and ctx has 587. docsify has the larger community by that measure.

Are docsify and ctx free?

Both are open source. docsify is licensed under MIT and ctx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between docsify and ctx?

docsify is written in JavaScript and ctx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, docsify or ctx?

Choose docsify if you want the larger community (31,513 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ctx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.