head to head · open source

dockle vs pika

dockle has 3,297 GitHub stars, 170 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. pika has 635 stars, 84 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. dockle leads on adoption by 419% (3,297 vs 635 stars). dockle is written in Go under Apache-2.0; pika is written in Go under Apache-2.0. dockle has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, pika 13%. pika was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (golang, security-audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

dockle ★ 3.3K pika ★ 635 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

dockle pika
GitHub stars ★ 3.3K ★ 635
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-10-03
Forks ⑂ 170 ⑂ 84
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick dockle if

  • You weight community size — 3.3K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full dockle profile →

pick pika if

  • You want the pika feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and pika fits your workflow better

full pika profile →

About dockle

Dockle is an open source container image linter written in Go that audits already built Docker images against security and best practice checkpoints, aimed at developers and DevSecOps teams who ship containers and want that audit to run automatically.

read the full dockle overview →

About pika

Pika is a lightweight probe monitoring system written in Go that gives operators real time infrastructure metrics alongside security auditing and tamper protection in one self hosted package.

read the full pika overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K Keycloak ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

dockle vs PayloadsAllTheThings dockle vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills dockle vs ProjectDiscovery dockle vs pentagi dockle vs PentestGPT dockle vs crowdsec dockle vs Osintgram dockle vs thc-hydra dockle vs vuls dockle vs osv-scanner dockle vs rengine dockle vs reconftw

Frequently asked questions

Is dockle or pika more popular?

dockle has 3,297 GitHub stars and pika has 635. dockle has the larger community by that measure.

Are dockle and pika free?

Both are open source. dockle is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pika under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between dockle and pika?

dockle is written in Go and pika in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, dockle or pika?

Choose dockle if you want the larger community (3,297 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pika if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.