head to head · open source

docetl vs sycamore

docetl has 4,101 GitHub stars, 443 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. sycamore has 608 stars, 72 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. docetl leads on adoption by 575% (4,101 vs 608 stars). docetl is written in Python under MIT; sycamore is written in Python under Apache-2.0. docetl has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, sycamore 12%. docetl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (etl, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

docetl ★ 4.1K sycamore ★ 608 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

docetl sycamore
GitHub stars ★ 4.1K ★ 608
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-05 2026-08-01
Forks ⑂ 443 ⑂ 72
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick docetl if

  • You weight community size — 4.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full docetl profile →

pick sycamore if

  • You want the sycamore feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and sycamore fits your workflow better

full sycamore profile →

About docetl

DocETL is a Python system for agentic LLM powered data processing and ETL. It lives in the data engineering and document processing ecosystem, where pipelines must turn structured records and unstructured documents into queryable tables. Users describe each operation in natural language, and DocETL provides operators such as map, reduce, and filter, then orchestrates them across the data.

read the full docetl overview →

About sycamore

Sycamore is an open source, AI powered document processing engine for ETL, retrieval augmented generation (RAG), LLM applications, and analytics on unstructured data, aimed at Python data engineers and AI developers who must turn reports, presentations, transcripts, and manuals into clean, chunked, searchable records.

read the full sycamore overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

airbyte vs cube airbyte vs shardingsphere cube vs shardingsphere airbyte vs debezium cube vs debezium shardingsphere vs debezium airbyte vs cocoindex cube vs cocoindex firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

docetl vs Airbyte docetl vs Cube docetl vs shardingsphere docetl vs debezium docetl vs CocoIndex docetl vs seatunnel docetl vs steampipe docetl vs realtime docetl vs CloudQuery docetl vs flink-cdc docetl vs Lightdash docetl vs fluvio

Frequently asked questions

Is docetl or sycamore more popular?

docetl has 4,101 GitHub stars and sycamore has 608. docetl has the larger community by that measure.

Are docetl and sycamore free?

Both are open source. docetl is licensed under MIT and sycamore under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between docetl and sycamore?

docetl is written in Python and sycamore in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, docetl or sycamore?

Choose docetl if you want the larger community (4,101 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose sycamore if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.