head to head · open source
Dify vs OpenBiliClaw
Dify has 160,251 GitHub stars, 25,336 forks, 1,067 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenBiliClaw has 3,661 stars, 199 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Dify leads on adoption by 4,277% (160,251 vs 3,661 stars). Dify is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; OpenBiliClaw is written in Python under MIT. Dify has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, OpenBiliClaw 5%. Dify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Dify | OpenBiliClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 160K | ★ 3.7K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 25K | ⑂ 199 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Dify if
- You weight community size — 160K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenBiliClaw if
- You want the OpenBiliClaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and OpenBiliClaw fits your workflow better
About Dify
Dify Cloud · Self hosting · Documentation · Dify edition overview Dify is an open source LLM app development platform. Its intuitive interface combines AI workflow, RAG pipeline, agent capabilities, model management, observability features (including Opik, Langfuse, and Arize Phoenix) and more, letting you quickly go from prototype to production. Here's a list of the core features: Quick start Before installing Dify, make sure your machine meets the following minimum system requirements: CPU = 2 Core RAM = 4 GiB The easiest way to start the Dify server is through Docker Compose. Before running Dify with the…
About OpenBiliClaw
🦀 OpenBiliClaw 通用个性化内容推荐 Agent——本地运行、跨平台理解你、只为你一个人构建 A general purpose personalized content discovery Agent — runs on your machine, understands only you 项目主页 English 中文 国内 AtomGit 托管：OpenBiliClaw（从 GitHub 自动同步源码） 🆕 重要更新：OpenBiliClaw 现在可以装进 DeepSeek Harness 新增 DSH 客户端插件 —— 把 OpenBiliClaw 装进 DeepSeek Harness：DSH 界面常驻第四栏（推荐 / 内容库 / 对话 / 画像 / 设置），并注册 22 个 Agent Bridge 工具，让 DSH 里的 Agent 也能读推荐、答探测、闭环学习——边用 DSH 干活，边刷跨平台个性化内容。→ github.com/whiteguo233/dsh openbiliclaw 📱 想要原生 App？Flutter 移动端客户端（Android / iOS / Web / 桌面）在独立仓库 OpenBiliClaw mobile ：推荐、对话、画像、收藏 / 稍后再看 / 30 天历史一应俱全，连接同一本地后端。 🇨🇳 国内下载（当前 v0.3.221） ：7…
read the full OpenBiliClaw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Dify or OpenBiliClaw more popular?
Dify has 160,251 GitHub stars and OpenBiliClaw has 3,661. Dify has the larger community by that measure.
Are Dify and OpenBiliClaw free?
Both are open source. Dify has no licence declared in this registry, and OpenBiliClaw is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Dify and OpenBiliClaw?
Dify is written in Python and OpenBiliClaw in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Dify or OpenBiliClaw?
Choose Dify if you want the larger community (160,251 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose OpenBiliClaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.