head to head · open source

Dify vs KiroCrew

Dify has 156,215 GitHub stars, 24,668 forks, 1,067 open issues and last shipped yesterday. KiroCrew has 3,991 stars, 615 forks, 1,885 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Dify leads on adoption by 3,814% (156,215 vs 3,991 stars). Dify is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; KiroCrew is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Dify has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, KiroCrew 15%. KiroCrew was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (agent, agentic-ai, automation, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Dify ★ 156K KiroCrew ★ 4.0K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Dify KiroCrew
GitHub stars ★ 156K ★ 4.0K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 25K ⑂ 615
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Dify if

  • You weight community size — 156K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Dify profile →

pick KiroCrew if

  • You want the KiroCrew feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and KiroCrew fits your workflow better

full KiroCrew profile →

About Dify

Dify is an open source LLM application development platform built in TypeScript. It provides a visual interface for designing, testing, and deploying AI workflows, RAG pipelines, and agentic systems without writing extensive code. The platform lives in the generative AI development ecosystem and targets teams needing to move from prototype to production using consistent tooling across environments.

read the full Dify overview →

About KiroCrew

Kiro Crew is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed development workspace that runs on your own hardware, persists across sessions, and self improves, built for developers and teams who want unattended agentic development work rather than a chat session that forgets everything when it closes.

read the full KiroCrew overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K ponytail ★ 141K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

Dify vs langchain Dify vs ponytail Dify vs generative-ai-for-beginners Dify vs graphify Dify vs claude-mem Dify vs ragflow Dify vs PaddleOCR Dify vs Agent-Reach Dify vs headroom Dify vs Mem0 Dify vs daily_stock_analysis Dify vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is Dify or KiroCrew more popular?

Dify has 156,215 GitHub stars and KiroCrew has 3,991. Dify has the larger community by that measure.

Are Dify and KiroCrew free?

Both are open source. Dify has no licence declared in this registry, and KiroCrew is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Dify and KiroCrew?

Dify is written in TypeScript and KiroCrew in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Dify or KiroCrew?

Choose Dify if you want the larger community (156,215 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose KiroCrew if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.