head to head · open source
devdocs vs huma
devdocs has 39,462 GitHub stars, 2,643 forks, 196 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. huma has 4,402 stars, 285 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. devdocs leads on adoption by 796% (39,462 vs 4,402 stars). devdocs is written in Ruby under MPL-2.0; huma is written in Go under MIT. devdocs has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, huma 6%. devdocs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (documentation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| devdocs | huma | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 39K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Ruby | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-15 | 2026-08-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 285 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick devdocs if
- You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
- You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick huma if
- You want the huma feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and huma fits your workflow better
About devdocs
DevDocs is an API documentation browser that combines multiple developer documentations into a single, clean and organized web UI with instant search, offline support, a mobile version, a dark theme and keyboard shortcuts, and it is aimed at developers who need to read and search API and reference documentation quickly.
read the full devdocs overview →
About huma
Huma is an MIT licensed Go micro framework for building HTTP REST and RPC APIs backed by OpenAPI 3.1 and JSON Schema, aimed at Go developers and teams that want generated, always current API documentation without abandoning their existing router, middleware, or logging stack.
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.
Frequently asked questions
Is devdocs or huma more popular?
devdocs has 39,462 GitHub stars and huma has 4,402. devdocs has the larger community by that measure.
Are devdocs and huma free?
Both are open source. devdocs is licensed under MPL-2.0 and huma under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between devdocs and huma?
devdocs is written in Ruby and huma in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, devdocs or huma?
Choose devdocs if you want the larger community (39,462 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose huma if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.