head to head · open source

devdocs vs Fumadocs

devdocs has 39,461 GitHub stars, 2,643 forks, 196 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Fumadocs has 13,171 stars, 730 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. devdocs leads on adoption by 200% (39,461 vs 13,171 stars). devdocs is written in Ruby under MPL-2.0; Fumadocs is written in TypeScript under MIT. devdocs has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Fumadocs 6%. Fumadocs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

devdocs ★ 39K Fumadocs ★ 13K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

devdocs Fumadocs
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 13K
License MPL-2.0 MIT
Written in Ruby TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 730
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick devdocs if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full devdocs profile →

pick Fumadocs if

  • You want the Fumadocs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Fumadocs fits your workflow better

full Fumadocs profile →

About devdocs

DevDocs is an API documentation browser that combines multiple developer documentations into a single, clean and organized web UI with instant search, offline support, a mobile version, a dark theme and keyboard shortcuts, and it is aimed at developers who need to read and search API and reference documentation quickly.

read the full devdocs overview →

About Fumadocs

Fumadocs is a documentation framework for React.js and Astro. It is written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license. The project targets documentation websites. It lives in the React.js and Astro documentation ecosystem. The supplied registry category is Content & Publishing / Documentation & Knowledge Base. The supplied repository metadata lists 13,134 stars and 728 forks. The supplied repository age is 0 years, and the last push timestamp is 2026 09 14T12:45:01Z.

read the full Fumadocs overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

devdocs vs storybook devdocs vs Understand-Anything devdocs vs docsify devdocs vs wiki devdocs vs mkdocs-material devdocs vs BookStack devdocs vs deepwiki-open devdocs vs Docs devdocs vs jsdoc devdocs vs Skill_Seekers devdocs vs gollum devdocs vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is devdocs or Fumadocs more popular?

devdocs has 39,461 GitHub stars and Fumadocs has 13,171. devdocs has the larger community by that measure.

Are devdocs and Fumadocs free?

Both are open source. devdocs is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Fumadocs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between devdocs and Fumadocs?

devdocs is written in Ruby and Fumadocs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, devdocs or Fumadocs?

Choose devdocs if you want the larger community (39,461 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Fumadocs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.