head to head · open source

deck.gl vs DeepBI

deck.gl has 14,597 GitHub stars, 2,269 forks, 532 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DeepBI has 2,383 stars, 370 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. deck.gl leads on adoption by 513% (14,597 vs 2,383 stars). deck.gl is written in TypeScript under MIT; DeepBI is written in Python under MIT. deck.gl has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, DeepBI 16%. deck.gl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

deck.gl ★ 15K DeepBI ★ 2.4K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

deck.gl DeepBI
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 2.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-28
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 370
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick deck.gl if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full deck.gl profile →

pick DeepBI if

  • You want the DeepBI feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and DeepBI fits your workflow better

full DeepBI profile →

About deck.gl

deck.gl is an MIT licensed, WebGL2 and WebGPU powered visualization framework that renders large scale geospatial and data driven layers in the browser, built for JavaScript, TypeScript and Python developers who need high performance maps and custom visualizations without writing their own GPU rendering code.

read the full deck.gl overview →

About DeepBI

DeepBI is an open source Python AI native data analysis platform in the business intelligence and data analytics ecosystem. It uses large language models to help users explore, query, visualize, and share data from connected sources. The MIT licensed project presents itself as a conversational data scientist for data driven decisions.

read the full DeepBI overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

deck.gl vs Mermaid deck.gl vs Apache Superset deck.gl vs echarts deck.gl vs Metabase deck.gl vs pixijs deck.gl vs diagram-design deck.gl vs Redash deck.gl vs dataease deck.gl vs dash deck.gl vs plotly.js deck.gl vs G6 deck.gl vs sigma.js

Frequently asked questions

Is deck.gl or DeepBI more popular?

deck.gl has 14,597 GitHub stars and DeepBI has 2,383. deck.gl has the larger community by that measure.

Are deck.gl and DeepBI free?

Both are open source. deck.gl is licensed under MIT and DeepBI under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between deck.gl and DeepBI?

deck.gl is written in TypeScript and DeepBI in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, deck.gl or DeepBI?

Choose deck.gl if you want the larger community (14,597 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose DeepBI if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.