head to head · open source

dagster vs zvec

dagster has 16,169 GitHub stars, 2,294 forks, 2,589 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zvec has 15,962 stars, 996 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dagster leads on adoption by 1% (16,169 vs 15,962 stars). dagster is written in Python under Apache-2.0; zvec is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. dagster has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, zvec 6%. dagster was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

dagster ★ 16K zvec ★ 16K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

dagster zvec
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 16K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 996
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick dagster if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full dagster profile →

pick zvec if

  • You want the zvec feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and zvec fits your workflow better

full zvec profile →

About dagster

Dagster is a cloud native data pipeline orchestrator written in Python and released under the Apache 2.0 licence, built for data engineers, data scientists, and machine learning teams who declare the tables, data sets, models, and reports their pipelines should produce and need those assets tested, observable, and kept up to date from local development through production.

read the full dagster overview →

About zvec

Zvec is an open source, in process vector database written in C++ and licensed under Apache 2.0, built to embed directly into applications so that vector search, full text search, and hybrid retrieval run inside the developer's own process instead of behind a separate service.

read the full zvec overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

dagster vs Ollama dagster vs llama.cpp dagster vs vllm dagster vs GPT4All dagster vs llama_index dagster vs LocalAI dagster vs PageIndex dagster vs Langfuse dagster vs cognee dagster vs taipy dagster vs langchain4j dagster vs txtai

Frequently asked questions

Is dagster or zvec more popular?

dagster has 16,169 GitHub stars and zvec has 15,962. dagster has the larger community by that measure.

Are dagster and zvec free?

Both are open source. dagster is licensed under Apache-2.0 and zvec under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between dagster and zvec?

dagster is written in Python and zvec in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, dagster or zvec?

Choose dagster if you want the larger community (16,169 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose zvec if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.