head to head · open source
CyberStrike vs NeuroSploit
CyberStrike has 3,354 GitHub stars, 574 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NeuroSploit has 1,499 stars, 357 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. CyberStrike leads on adoption by 124% (3,354 vs 1,499 stars). CyberStrike is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; NeuroSploit is written in Rust under MIT. CyberStrike has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, NeuroSploit 24%. CyberStrike was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (ai-penetration-testing, ai-security, ctf-tools, cybersecurity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CyberStrike | NeuroSploit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.4K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 574 | ⑂ 357 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CyberStrike if
- You weight community size — 3.4K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NeuroSploit if
- You want the NeuroSploit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and NeuroSploit fits your workflow better
About CyberStrike
English 简体中文 繁體中文 한국어 Deutsch Español Français Italiano Dansk 日本語 Polski Русский Bosanski العربية Norsk Português (Brasil) ไทย Türkçe Українська বাংলা Ελληνικά Tiếng Việt हिन्दी The first open source AI agent built for offensive security. Automated penetration testing from your terminal — plug in your Claude, GPT, or any LLM subscription and turn it into an autonomous red team agent with 13+ specialized agents, 7,600+ security skills, and 120+ OWASP test cases. 150+ AI providers • 5,300+ models • 56+ built in tools • 176+ MCP tools Quick Start • Intelligence Layer • What Makes It…
read the full CyberStrike overview →
About NeuroSploit
🧠 NeuroSploit v4.4.0 Autonomous, multi model penetration testing harness — Rust, CLI first. by Joas A Santos & Red Team Leaders What is NeuroSploit? NeuroSploit is an autonomous penetration testing tool. You point it at a target; it does the security assessment on its own and hands you a report — recon, exploitation, chaining findings into real impact, and validation, with no human driving each step. The key idea: the harness is the pentester, not the model. Instead of asking one LLM to "hack this", a Rust engine runs the methodology — it picks the right specialist agents for what it finds, runs them in…
read the full NeuroSploit overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CyberStrike or NeuroSploit more popular?
CyberStrike has 3,354 GitHub stars and NeuroSploit has 1,499. CyberStrike has the larger community by that measure.
Are CyberStrike and NeuroSploit free?
Both are open source. CyberStrike is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and NeuroSploit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CyberStrike and NeuroSploit?
CyberStrike is written in TypeScript and NeuroSploit in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CyberStrike or NeuroSploit?
Choose CyberStrike if you want the larger community (3,354 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose NeuroSploit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.