head to head · open source
CyberStrike vs hacktheweb
CyberStrike has 3,579 GitHub stars, 618 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hacktheweb has 1,311 stars, 286 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CyberStrike leads on adoption by 173% (3,579 vs 1,311 stars). CyberStrike is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; hacktheweb is written in Python under MIT. CyberStrike has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, hacktheweb 22%. hacktheweb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-security, cybersecurity, ethical-hacking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CyberStrike | hacktheweb | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.6K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 618 | ⑂ 286 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CyberStrike if
- You weight community size — 3.6K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick hacktheweb if
- You want the hacktheweb feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and hacktheweb fits your workflow better
About CyberStrike
English 简体中文 繁體中文 한국어 Deutsch Español Français Italiano Dansk 日本語 Polski Русский Bosanski العربية Norsk Português (Brasil) ไทย Türkçe Українська বাংলা Ελληνικά Tiếng Việt हिन्दी The first open source AI agent built for offensive security. Automated penetration testing from your terminal — plug in your Claude, GPT, or any LLM subscription and turn it into an autonomous red team agent with 13+ specialized agents, 7,600+ security skills, and 120+ OWASP test cases. 150+ AI providers • 5,300+ models • 56+ built in tools • 176+ MCP tools Quick Start • Intelligence Layer • What Makes It…
read the full CyberStrike overview →
About hacktheweb
HackTheWeb AI Powered Web Application Penetration Testing Framework Automated security testing with intelligent decision making Website • Features • Installation • Usage • Documentation 🪙 Official Token Contract Address (CA) [!IMPORTANT] Official Contract Address (Solana): • Network: Solana (pump.fun) • Security Notice: Always verify the contract address matches this official repository. Never trust unverified third parties. 🎯 Overview HackTheWeb is a production ready, AI powered web application penetration testing tool designed for security professionals and ethical hackers. It uses rule based artificial…
read the full hacktheweb overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CyberStrike or hacktheweb more popular?
CyberStrike has 3,579 GitHub stars and hacktheweb has 1,311. CyberStrike has the larger community by that measure.
Are CyberStrike and hacktheweb free?
Both are open source. CyberStrike is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and hacktheweb under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CyberStrike and hacktheweb?
CyberStrike is written in TypeScript and hacktheweb in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CyberStrike or hacktheweb?
Choose CyberStrike if you want the larger community (3,579 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose hacktheweb if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.