head to head · open source
reconftw vs crlfuzz
reconftw has 8,138 GitHub stars, 1,235 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. crlfuzz has 1,566 stars, 146 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. reconftw leads on adoption by 420% (8,138 vs 1,566 stars). reconftw is written in Shell under MIT; crlfuzz is written in Go under MIT. reconftw has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, crlfuzz 9%. reconftw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| reconftw | crlfuzz | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.1K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Shell | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-22 | 2026-08-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 146 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick reconftw if
- You weight community size — 8.1K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick crlfuzz if
- You want the crlfuzz feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and crlfuzz fits your workflow better
About reconftw
reconFTW is an automated reconnaissance framework, written in Shell under the MIT licence, that runs a curated chain of security tools against a target domain to enumerate subdomains and hosts, gather OSINT, analyse web surfaces, and check for vulnerabilities; it is built for security researchers, penetration testers, and bug bounty hunters.
read the full reconftw overview →
About crlfuzz
CRLFuzz is a fast, MIT licensed command line tool written in Go that scans web targets for CRLF injection vulnerabilities, aimed at penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security engineers who need to check either a single URL or a long list of them quickly.
read the full crlfuzz overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is reconftw or crlfuzz more popular?
reconftw has 8,138 GitHub stars and crlfuzz has 1,566. reconftw has the larger community by that measure.
Are reconftw and crlfuzz free?
Both are open source. reconftw is licensed under MIT and crlfuzz under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between reconftw and crlfuzz?
reconftw is written in Shell and crlfuzz in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, reconftw or crlfuzz?
Choose reconftw if you want the larger community (8,138 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose crlfuzz if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.