head to head · open source
LobeChat vs CosyVoice
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CosyVoice has 24,247 stars, 2,769 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 245% (83,716 vs 24,247 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; CosyVoice is written in Python under Apache-2.0. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, CosyVoice 11%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatgpt), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | CosyVoice | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 24K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-05-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 2.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CosyVoice if
- You want the CosyVoice feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and CosyVoice fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About CosyVoice
👉🏻 CosyVoice 👈🏻 Fun CosyVoice 3.0 : Demos; Paper; Modelscope; Huggingface; CV3 Eval CosyVoice 2.0 : Demos; Paper; Modelscope; HuggingFace CosyVoice 1.0 : Demos; Paper; Modelscope; HuggingFace Highlight🔥 Fun CosyVoice 3.0 is an advanced text to speech (TTS) system based on large language models (LLM), surpassing its predecessor (CosyVoice 2.0) in content consistency, speaker similarity, and prosody naturalness. It is designed for zero shot multilingual speech synthesis in the wild. Key Features Language Coverage : Covers 9 common languages (Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, German, Spanish, French…
read the full CosyVoice overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or CosyVoice more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and CosyVoice has 24,247. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and CosyVoice free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and CosyVoice is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and CosyVoice?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and CosyVoice in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or CosyVoice?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose CosyVoice if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.