head to head · open source

Convex vs Structr

Convex has 12,583 GitHub stars, 814 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Structr has 830 stars, 161 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Convex leads on adoption by 1,416% (12,583 vs 830 stars). Convex is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Structr is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. Convex has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Structr 19%. Convex was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (backend), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Convex ★ 13K Structr ★ 830 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Convex Structr
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 830
License Custom / other Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 814 ⑂ 161
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Convex if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Convex profile →

pick Structr if

  • You want the Structr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Structr fits your workflow better

full Structr profile →

About Convex

Convex is an open source reactive database for web application developers, with a Rust backend and TypeScript packages, in the backend, database, and TypeScript ecosystem. It combines a database, server functions, and client libraries so developers can fetch data and perform business logic in pure TypeScript while keeping strong consistency and live updating behavior.

read the full Convex overview →

About Structr

Structr is an open source, generic low code development and runtime platform built on a graph database, aimed at developers and teams who need to model, build, and operate fully custom applications rather than configure a prebuilt product.

read the full Structr overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Convex vs ECC Convex vs react Convex vs Langflow Convex vs Supabase Convex vs puppeteer Convex vs archify Convex vs PocketBase Convex vs i-have-adhd Convex vs codebase-memory-mcp Convex vs ToolJet Convex vs AppSmith Convex vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Convex or Structr more popular?

Convex has 12,583 GitHub stars and Structr has 830. Convex has the larger community by that measure.

Are Convex and Structr free?

Neither Convex nor Structr declares a licence in this registry, so check each project's own repository before relying on either for a commercial use. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Convex and Structr?

Convex is written in TypeScript and Structr in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Convex or Structr?

Choose Convex if you want the larger community (12,583 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Structr if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.