head to head · open source

ComfyUI vs waku-agent

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars, 15,874 forks, 4,894 open issues and last shipped today. waku-agent has 1,795 stars, 359 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ComfyUI leads on adoption by 7,363% (133,963 vs 1,795 stars). ComfyUI is written in Python under GPL-3.0; waku-agent is written in Python under MIT. ComfyUI has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, waku-agent 20%. ComfyUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ComfyUI ★ 134K waku-agent ★ 1.8K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ComfyUI waku-agent
GitHub stars ★ 134K ★ 1.8K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 359
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ComfyUI if

  • You weight community size — 134K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ComfyUI profile →

pick waku-agent if

  • You want the waku-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and waku-agent fits your workflow better

full waku-agent profile →

About ComfyUI

ComfyUI is a GPL 3.0 licensed Python and PyTorch node graph application, local API, and backend for running diffusion models across image, video, audio, 3D, and text workflows, built for visual professionals who want control over every model, parameter, and output, and for developers who embed those workflows into production pipelines.

read the full ComfyUI overview →

About waku-agent

waku agent is a local first, MIT licensed Python AI agent harness for developers who want an assistant whose loop, memory and evaluation code they can read and own, rather than a hosted assistant that keeps those parts out of sight.

read the full waku-agent overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

ComfyUI vs OpenClaw ComfyUI vs Hermes Agent ComfyUI vs Open WebUI ComfyUI vs odysseus ComfyUI vs LobeChat ComfyUI vs AnythingLLM ComfyUI vs Cherry Studio ComfyUI vs nanobot ComfyUI vs Jan ComfyUI vs LibreChat ComfyUI vs chatbox ComfyUI vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is ComfyUI or waku-agent more popular?

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars and waku-agent has 1,795. ComfyUI has the larger community by that measure.

Are ComfyUI and waku-agent free?

Both are open source. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and waku-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ComfyUI and waku-agent?

ComfyUI is written in Python and waku-agent in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ComfyUI or waku-agent?

Choose ComfyUI if you want the larger community (133,963 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose waku-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.