head to head · open source

ComfyUI vs RasaGPT

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars, 15,874 forks, 4,894 open issues and last shipped today. RasaGPT has 2,465 stars, 249 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. ComfyUI leads on adoption by 5,335% (133,963 vs 2,465 stars). ComfyUI is written in Python under GPL-3.0; RasaGPT is written in Python under MIT. ComfyUI has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, RasaGPT 10%. ComfyUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ComfyUI ★ 134K RasaGPT ★ 2.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ComfyUI RasaGPT
GitHub stars ★ 134K ★ 2.5K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2025-11-12
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 249
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ComfyUI if

  • You weight community size — 134K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ComfyUI profile →

pick RasaGPT if

  • You want the RasaGPT feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and RasaGPT fits your workflow better

full RasaGPT profile →

About ComfyUI

ComfyUI is a GPL 3.0 licensed Python and PyTorch node graph application, local API, and backend for running diffusion models across image, video, audio, 3D, and text workflows, built for visual professionals who want control over every model, parameter, and output, and for developers who embed those workflows into production pipelines.

read the full ComfyUI overview →

About RasaGPT

RasaGPT is an MIT licensed, headless LLM chatbot platform and reference implementation that combines the Rasa dialogue framework with Langchain and LlamaIndex for indexing, retrieval and context injection, aimed at Python developers who want a working self hosted starting point for a document aware Telegram or API chatbot.

read the full RasaGPT overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

ComfyUI vs OpenClaw ComfyUI vs Hermes Agent ComfyUI vs Open WebUI ComfyUI vs odysseus ComfyUI vs LobeChat ComfyUI vs AnythingLLM ComfyUI vs Cherry Studio ComfyUI vs nanobot ComfyUI vs Jan ComfyUI vs LibreChat ComfyUI vs chatbox ComfyUI vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is ComfyUI or RasaGPT more popular?

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars and RasaGPT has 2,465. ComfyUI has the larger community by that measure.

Are ComfyUI and RasaGPT free?

Both are open source. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and RasaGPT under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ComfyUI and RasaGPT?

ComfyUI is written in Python and RasaGPT in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ComfyUI or RasaGPT?

Choose ComfyUI if you want the larger community (133,963 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose RasaGPT if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.