head to head · open source

ComfyUI vs gptme

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars, 15,874 forks, 4,894 open issues and last shipped today. gptme has 4,420 stars, 432 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped today. ComfyUI leads on adoption by 2,931% (133,963 vs 4,420 stars). ComfyUI is written in Python under GPL-3.0; gptme is written in Python under MIT. ComfyUI has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, gptme 10%. gptme was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ComfyUI ★ 134K gptme ★ 4.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ComfyUI gptme
GitHub stars ★ 134K ★ 4.4K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 432
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ComfyUI if

  • You weight community size — 134K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ComfyUI profile →

pick gptme if

  • You want the gptme feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and gptme fits your workflow better

full gptme profile →

About ComfyUI

ComfyUI is a GPL 3.0 licensed Python and PyTorch node graph application, local API, and backend for running diffusion models across image, video, audio, 3D, and text workflows, built for visual professionals who want control over every model, parameter, and output, and for developers who embed those workflows into production pipelines.

read the full ComfyUI overview →

About gptme

gptme is a free and open source, provider agnostic AI agent that runs in any terminal — on a laptop, over SSH, in tmux, on headless servers, or in CI pipelines — and is aimed at developers and knowledge workers who want a local first coding and automation assistant they can extend into persistent autonomous agents.

read the full gptme overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

ComfyUI vs OpenClaw ComfyUI vs Hermes Agent ComfyUI vs Open WebUI ComfyUI vs odysseus ComfyUI vs LobeChat ComfyUI vs AnythingLLM ComfyUI vs Cherry Studio ComfyUI vs nanobot ComfyUI vs Jan ComfyUI vs LibreChat ComfyUI vs chatbox ComfyUI vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is ComfyUI or gptme more popular?

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars and gptme has 4,420. ComfyUI has the larger community by that measure.

Are ComfyUI and gptme free?

Both are open source. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and gptme under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ComfyUI and gptme?

ComfyUI is written in Python and gptme in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ComfyUI or gptme?

Choose ComfyUI if you want the larger community (133,963 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose gptme if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.