head to head · open source

CloudQuery vs peerdb

CloudQuery has 6,521 GitHub stars, 558 forks, 166 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. peerdb has 3,274 stars, 213 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloudQuery leads on adoption by 99% (6,521 vs 3,274 stars). CloudQuery is written in Go under MPL-2.0; peerdb is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. CloudQuery has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, peerdb 7%. peerdb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (bigquery), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloudQuery ★ 6.5K peerdb ★ 3.3K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloudQuery peerdb
GitHub stars ★ 6.5K ★ 3.3K
License MPL-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 558 ⑂ 213
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloudQuery if

  • You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloudQuery profile →

pick peerdb if

  • You want the peerdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and peerdb fits your workflow better

full peerdb profile →

About CloudQuery

CloudQuery is an open source, Go based cloud asset inventory and ELT tool, licensed under MPL 2.0, that syncs metadata from AWS, Azure, GCP, and more than 70 cloud and SaaS sources into a data warehouse so platform, security, and FinOps teams can query it with SQL.

read the full CloudQuery overview →

About peerdb

PeerDB is a data integration project in the Postgres ecosystem. It lives in the Data & Analytics / Data Engineering & Integration category and focuses on streaming data from Postgres to data warehouses, queues, and storage engines. The project is built around Postgres first ETL and change data capture workflows rather than a broad connector catalog.

read the full peerdb overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

airbyte vs cube airbyte vs shardingsphere cube vs shardingsphere airbyte vs debezium cube vs debezium shardingsphere vs debezium airbyte vs cocoindex cube vs cocoindex firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

CloudQuery vs Airbyte CloudQuery vs Cube CloudQuery vs shardingsphere CloudQuery vs debezium CloudQuery vs CocoIndex CloudQuery vs seatunnel CloudQuery vs steampipe CloudQuery vs realtime CloudQuery vs flink-cdc CloudQuery vs Lightdash CloudQuery vs fluvio CloudQuery vs whodb

Frequently asked questions

Is CloudQuery or peerdb more popular?

CloudQuery has 6,521 GitHub stars and peerdb has 3,274. CloudQuery has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloudQuery and peerdb free?

Both are open source. CloudQuery is licensed under MPL-2.0 and peerdb under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloudQuery and peerdb?

CloudQuery is written in Go and peerdb in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloudQuery or peerdb?

Choose CloudQuery if you want the larger community (6,521 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose peerdb if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.