head to head · open source
CL4R1T4S vs wonderful-prompts
CL4R1T4S has 51,737 GitHub stars, 10,551 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. wonderful-prompts has 6,387 stars, 540 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. CL4R1T4S leads on adoption by 710% (51,737 vs 6,387 stars). CL4R1T4S is written in various languages under AGPL-3.0; wonderful-prompts is written in various languages under MIT. CL4R1T4S has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, wonderful-prompts 8%. CL4R1T4S was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (chatgpt, openai, prompt-engineering), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CL4R1T4S | wonderful-prompts | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 6.4K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | — | — |
| Last push | 2026-09-22 | 2026-08-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 11K | ⑂ 540 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CL4R1T4S if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wonderful-prompts if
- You want the wonderful-prompts feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- You evaluated both and wonderful-prompts fits your workflow better
About CL4R1T4S
CL4R1T4S AI SYSTEMS TRANSPARENCY AND OBSERVABILITY FOR ALL! Full extracted system prompts, guidelines, and tools from OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, xAI, Perplexity, Cursor, Windsurf, Devin, Manus, Replit, and more – virtually all major AI models + agents! 📌 Why This Exists "In order to trust the output, one must understand the input." AI labs shape how models behave using massive, unseen prompt scaffolds. Because AI is a trusted external intelligence layer for a growing number of humans, these hidden instructions can affect the perceptions and behavior of the public. These prompts define: What AIs can’t say What…
read the full CL4R1T4S overview →
About wonderful-prompts
Prompts 精选 🚀 🔥中文 prompts 精选，提升 ChatGPT 可玩性和可用性！上百个高质量 prompt 让你得心应手的驾驭 AI 🚀。 本项目是 ChatGPT 中文指南作者 优化、精选的系列中文 ChatGPT Prompts，并提供图文使用示例，让大家能够更好的学习使用 ChatGPT。 ChatGPT 使用教程、精选开源项目、AI 工具等可查看：ChatGPT 中文指南 🔥 如何编写高质量 ChatGPT 咒语可使用：LangGPT 🔥 项目持续更新中，欢迎通过 issue 提交有趣的 Prompt 更多精彩提示词：Prompt 飞书知识库 🆕 2026 提示：本仓库的提示词对 GPT 5、Claude、DeepSeek V4、Gemini 等当代模型通用。面向思考模型（DeepSeek V4 / Claude 扩展思考 / GPT 5 推理模式）写提示时，重点是说清目标与验收标准、少用 few shot、不必再写"一步一步思考"——详见 DeepSeek V4 思考模式提示技巧 与 awesome deepseek prompts、awesome claude prompts。 目录 Prompts 精选 🚀 目录 Prompt 生成优化 Prompt 工程师 Prompt 工程专家 Stable Audio 音乐提示词生成器 Stable Diffusion 提示词生成…
read the full wonderful-prompts overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CL4R1T4S or wonderful-prompts more popular?
CL4R1T4S has 51,737 GitHub stars and wonderful-prompts has 6,387. CL4R1T4S has the larger community by that measure.
Are CL4R1T4S and wonderful-prompts free?
Both are open source. CL4R1T4S is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and wonderful-prompts under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CL4R1T4S and wonderful-prompts?
CL4R1T4S is written in various languages and wonderful-prompts in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CL4R1T4S or wonderful-prompts?
Choose CL4R1T4S if you want the larger community (51,737 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose wonderful-prompts if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.