head to head · open source
CL4R1T4S vs codex-keysmith
CL4R1T4S has 51,750 GitHub stars, 10,552 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. codex-keysmith has 4,793 stars, 740 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. CL4R1T4S leads on adoption by 980% (51,750 vs 4,793 stars). CL4R1T4S is written in various languages under AGPL-3.0; codex-keysmith is written in Python under MIT. CL4R1T4S has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, codex-keysmith 15%. codex-keysmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (prompt-engineering), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CL4R1T4S | codex-keysmith | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 4.8K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | — | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 11K | ⑂ 740 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CL4R1T4S if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codex-keysmith if
- You want the codex-keysmith feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and codex-keysmith fits your workflow better
About CL4R1T4S
CL4R1T4S AI SYSTEMS TRANSPARENCY AND OBSERVABILITY FOR ALL! Full extracted system prompts, guidelines, and tools from OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, xAI, Perplexity, Cursor, Windsurf, Devin, Manus, Replit, and more – virtually all major AI models + agents! 📌 Why This Exists "In order to trust the output, one must understand the input." AI labs shape how models behave using massive, unseen prompt scaffolds. Because AI is a trusted external intelligence layer for a growing number of humans, these hidden instructions can affect the perceptions and behavior of the public. These prompts define: What AIs can’t say What…
read the full CL4R1T4S overview →
About codex-keysmith
简体中文 · English · 使用说明 · License codex keysmith 给 Codex 装上一份可撤销的指令。先看计划，确认了再写入。 简体中文 Keysmith 给本机的 AI 编程工具装指令：先预览，再写入，能验证，能撤走。 codex keysmith 面向 Codex 。装上之后，新开的对话会按这份指令工作。不改 Codex 软件本身，也不读取账号和密钥。默认只装一份稿。 [!IMPORTANT] 这会改变该 Codex 配置下 之后新开的对话 。默认只给你看计划，加上确认才会写入。装完后请开一个新任务。 使用方式 1. 先看计划。 确认之前什么都不会写入。 2. 确认后装上。 指令交给本机 Codex，软件保持原样。 3. 新开一轮对话。 关掉旧任务，开一个新的。 4. 随时撤走。 同样先看计划，确认后恢复成原来的样子。 选哪个 Keysmith 每个工具一份安装器。也有未签名桌面版（Apple Silicon / Windows x64）。 开始使用 本机需要已经装好 Codex。稳妥路径是 最新稳定 Release 的单文件脚本（当前公开稳定脚本包括 codex instruct v0.5.1.py ）。也有未签名桌面版。 源码路径： git clone && cd codex keysmith ，再把上述脚本名换成 codex instruct.py 。装完后关掉旧任务，开一个新…
read the full codex-keysmith overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CL4R1T4S or codex-keysmith more popular?
CL4R1T4S has 51,750 GitHub stars and codex-keysmith has 4,793. CL4R1T4S has the larger community by that measure.
Are CL4R1T4S and codex-keysmith free?
Both are open source. CL4R1T4S is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and codex-keysmith under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CL4R1T4S and codex-keysmith?
CL4R1T4S is written in various languages and codex-keysmith in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CL4R1T4S or codex-keysmith?
Choose CL4R1T4S if you want the larger community (51,750 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose codex-keysmith if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.