head to head · open source

CL4R1T4S vs codex-keysmith

CL4R1T4S has 50,059 GitHub stars, 10,280 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. codex-keysmith has 4,544 stars, 714 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CL4R1T4S leads on adoption by 1,002% (50,059 vs 4,544 stars). CL4R1T4S is written in various languages under AGPL-3.0; codex-keysmith is written in Python under MIT. CL4R1T4S has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, codex-keysmith 16%. codex-keysmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (prompt-engineering), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CL4R1T4S ★ 50K codex-keysmith ★ 4.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CL4R1T4S codex-keysmith
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 4.5K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 714
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CL4R1T4S if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CL4R1T4S profile →

pick codex-keysmith if

  • You want the codex-keysmith feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and codex-keysmith fits your workflow better

full codex-keysmith profile →

About CL4R1T4S

CL4R1T4S is an AGPL 3.0 repository of full extracted system prompts, guidelines and tools from the major AI models and agents — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, Cursor, Lovable, Replit and more — for anyone who wants to know what instructions sit behind the AI systems they use.

read the full CL4R1T4S overview →

About codex-keysmith

codex keysmith is a local first Python command line tool that installs, previews, versions, and removes instruction files for Codex, built for developers who want their Codex sessions to follow a controlled, reversible prompt configuration.

read the full codex-keysmith overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

CL4R1T4S vs Dify CL4R1T4S vs langchain CL4R1T4S vs ponytail CL4R1T4S vs generative-ai-for-beginners CL4R1T4S vs graphify CL4R1T4S vs claude-mem CL4R1T4S vs ragflow CL4R1T4S vs PaddleOCR CL4R1T4S vs Agent-Reach CL4R1T4S vs headroom CL4R1T4S vs Mem0 CL4R1T4S vs daily_stock_analysis

Frequently asked questions

Is CL4R1T4S or codex-keysmith more popular?

CL4R1T4S has 50,059 GitHub stars and codex-keysmith has 4,544. CL4R1T4S has the larger community by that measure.

Are CL4R1T4S and codex-keysmith free?

Both are open source. CL4R1T4S is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and codex-keysmith under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CL4R1T4S and codex-keysmith?

CL4R1T4S is written in various languages and codex-keysmith in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CL4R1T4S or codex-keysmith?

Choose CL4R1T4S if you want the larger community (50,059 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose codex-keysmith if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.