head to head · open source

Cherry Studio vs rome

Cherry Studio has 52,003 GitHub stars, 4,978 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped today. rome has 513 stars, 40 forks, 47 open issues and last shipped today. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 10,037% (52,003 vs 513 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; rome is written in TypeScript under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, rome 8%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agent, claude-code, codex), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cherry Studio ★ 52K rome ★ 513 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cherry Studio rome
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 513
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 40
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cherry Studio if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cherry Studio profile →

pick rome if

  • You want the rome feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rome fits your workflow better

full rome profile →

About Cherry Studio

Cherry Studio is a cross platform desktop application for interacting with large language models, built in TypeScript under the AGPL 3.0 license. It operates in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, providing a unified interface to access cloud hosted models (OpenAI, Gemini, Anthropic), web services (Claude, Poe, Perplexity), and locally hosted models via Ollama or LM Studio.

read the full Cherry Studio overview →

About rome

Rome is a MIT licensed, TypeScript agent operating system for people who want to run a self hosted environment where humans and agents collaborate and the results compound, and it also serves as an open source alternative to Grok Bot and Meta's Muse.

read the full rome overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Cherry Studio vs OpenClaw Cherry Studio vs Hermes Agent Cherry Studio vs Open WebUI Cherry Studio vs ComfyUI Cherry Studio vs odysseus Cherry Studio vs LobeChat Cherry Studio vs AnythingLLM Cherry Studio vs nanobot Cherry Studio vs Jan Cherry Studio vs LibreChat Cherry Studio vs chatbox Cherry Studio vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is Cherry Studio or rome more popular?

Cherry Studio has 52,003 GitHub stars and rome has 513. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cherry Studio and rome free?

Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and rome under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Cherry Studio and rome?

Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and rome in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or rome?

Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (52,003 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose rome if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.