head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs Pearl
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars, 5,172 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pearl has 1,098 stars, 181 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 4,749% (53,242 vs 1,098 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Pearl is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Pearl 16%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | Pearl | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-04-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 181 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Pearl if
- You want the Pearl feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Pearl fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About Pearl
Bubble Lab Open core workflow engine powering Bubble Lab — and fully runnable, hostable, and extensible on its own. Use Bubble Lab Platform • View Demos • Documentation Editing Workflows Running Workflows 📋 Overview Bubble Lab is a Slack native AI operator platform that helps teams automate operational work directly inside Slack using Pearl, its AI assistant. Instead of switching between tools, teams can ask Pearl to execute workflows, access systems, and perform tasks across their stack. This repository contains the open core workflow engine that powers the Bubble Lab platform . It is the same execution engine…
read the full Pearl overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or Pearl more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars and Pearl has 1,098. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and Pearl free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Pearl under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and Pearl?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and Pearl in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or Pearl?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,242 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Pearl if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.